Dimensity 9200 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (with Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 19% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Higher GPU frequency (~33%)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 3050 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1948K vs 1755K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1755232
1948428
CPU 549345 623766
GPU 500902 596540
Memory 271291 331200
UX 433694 396922
Total score 1755232 1948428
Samples [4 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 204.3 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 147 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 170.8 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 127.6 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 153.7 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16.9 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 44.2 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.32 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 15.8 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 7.83 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.47 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.57 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.58 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2042.2 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 3 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1351 1346
Stability - 86%
Graphics test 10 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5571 5948
Graphics test 21 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 23 FPS 25 FPS
Section 2 22 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 19 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3565 -
Stability 80% -
Graphics test 21 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14015
Web score 15272 14034
Video editing score 5353 6661
Data manipulation score 13696 13175
Photo editing score 15932 23584
Writing score 18803 17637
Phones tested Less than 3 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-12 (Shigetora)AnTuTu 111811839
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-06 (Geoff Jan)AnTuTu 111405303
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-06 (Tuแบฅn Nguyแป…n)AnTuTu 111755232
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 GPU9624
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 CPU1732 / 4274
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Mohammad Mamun)AnTuTu 122125725
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Muhamad Rosyid (indonesia))AnTuTu 122280224
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 -> Timur55AnTuTu 111910022
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-02 (LEADER OF DAWN)Geekbench 7 CPU1165 / 3044
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9200 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz โ€“ Cortex-X3
3x 2.85 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A510
1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3050 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 17 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture Valhall 4th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 981 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 11 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1408 896
FLOPS 2762.5 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 MediaTek NPU 880

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2022 December 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6985 MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
43 (16.3%)
221 (83.7%)
Total votes: 264

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 9200, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Antar sen October 9, 2026 at 07:17 PM
8400vs 9200 win 8400...๐Ÿ˜ฒ๐Ÿ’€
0 Reply
Avatar
Pankaj June 16, 2026 at 07:41 PM
I am using MTD 8400 Ultra from month
0 Reply