Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G95 vs Dimensity 810 – what's better?

Helio G95 vs Dimensity 810

Helio G95
VS
Dimensity 810
Helio G95
Dimensity 810

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 810 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v10
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (1)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 810
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Announced 11-months later
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 10 score – 430K vs 414K
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Helio G95
vs
Dimensity 810

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G95
414441
Dimensity 810 +4%
430382
CPU 121831 136888
GPU 105016 82701
Memory 78906 95306
UX 104719 114326
Total score 414441 430382
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G95
640
Dimensity 810 +22%
783
Multi-Core Score
Helio G95
1753
Dimensity 810 +12%
1955
Asset compression 93.5 MB/sec 97.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46 pages/sec 50.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 58.3 Mpixels/sec 63 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.5 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
HDR 55.2 Mpixels/sec 57.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 4.91 images/sec 5.4 images/sec
Photo processing 14.5 images/sec 17.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.47 Mpixels/sec 2.85 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G95 +41%
1949
Dimensity 810
1381
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Helio G95 +15%
1482
Dimensity 810
1286
Stability 98% 97%
Graphics test 8 FPS 7 FPS
Score 1482 1286

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 51 FPS
[Low]		 77 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]		 42 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 57 FPS
[Low]		 74 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[High]		 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 27 FPS
[Low]		 37 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 52 FPS
[Ultra]		 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Realme 7
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Dimensity 810

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2050 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP4 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 4 2
Shading units 36 64
Total shaders 144 128
FLOPS 259.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
Max size 10 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci MediaTek APU 3.0
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 August 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6785V/CD MT6833V
Official page MediaTek Helio G95 official site MediaTek Dimensity 810 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
830 (25.3%)
2455 (74.7%)
Total votes: 3285

Related Comparisons

1. Helio G99 or Dimensity 810
2. Snapdragon 685 or Dimensity 810
3. Snapdragon 680 or Dimensity 810
4. Helio G96 or Dimensity 810
5. Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 810
6. Snapdragon 680 or Helio G95
7. Helio G99 or Helio G95
8. Helio G96 or Helio G95
9. Dimensity 700 or Helio G95
10. Snapdragon 695 or Helio G95
Compare other chipsets (160+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 810 and Helio G95, or ask any questions
Avatar
anonymous 29 April 2022 08:15
Both chips are basically the same in terms of performance but the 810 has far better power consumption.
+134 Reply
Avatar
That dude 😎 20 August 2022 13:38
I feel kinda hurt that the dimensity 810 has a weak GPU still I don't see much of an upgrade except you want 5g and higher download speeds.
+44 Reply
Promotion
EnglishРусский