Snapdragon 632 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (Adreno 506) with the newer 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Performs 8x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 5x) AnTuTu 9 score – 717K vs 144K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 14 nm)
  • 72% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Announced 2-years and 3-months later
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A14 Bionic +396%
717091
CPU 59142 196691
GPU 16534 272532
Memory 24144 120512
UX 44986 131640
Total score 144557 717091
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A14 Bionic +504%
1583
Multi-Core Score
A14 Bionic +293%
4077
Image compression 82.3 Mpixels/s 171.5 Mpixels/s
Face detection 12 images/s 33.6 images/s
Speech recognition 19.4 words/s 94.8 words/s
Machine learning 13.4 images/s 93.1 images/s
Camera shooting 7.96 images/s 38.7 images/s
HTML 5 1.05 Mnodes/s 4.5 Mnodes/s
SQLite 427.5 Krows/s 1060 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
A14 Bionic +5578%
7609
Stability - 77%
Graphics test 1 FPS 45 FPS
Score 134 7609

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 632 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 1800 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
Process 14 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 2 billion 11.8 billion
TDP 5 W 6 W

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 506 Apple GPU
Architecture Adreno 500 -
GPU frequency 650 MHz -
Execution units 1 4
Shading units 96 -
FLOPS 124.8 Gigaflops 998 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 11 -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 933 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 546 Neural Engine
Storage type eMMC 5.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 1900 x 1200 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+

Connectivity

Modem X9 -
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced June 2018 September 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SDM632 APL1W01
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
5 (33.3%)
10 (66.7%)
Total votes: 15

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 632, or ask any questions
Promotion