Snapdragon 632 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (Adreno 506) with the newer 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Performs 9.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 5.4x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1326K vs 243K
  • Supports 355% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 7.5 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 14 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~76%)
  • 72% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A14 Bionic +445%
1326975
CPU 123089 364692
GPU 15195 311592
Memory 44974 180518
UX 60433 470169
Total score 243691 1326975
Samples Less than 3 [55 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A14 Bionic +610%
2095
Multi-Core Score
A14 Bionic +411%
5297
Asset compression 72.6 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 30.4 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 45.7 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 12.2 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 36.8 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.41 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 7.79 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.85 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 90 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur - 27.6 images/sec
Face detection - 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 1772.1 FPS
API - Metal
Samples - 17 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2767
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Section 1 - 13 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2229
Stability - 86%
Graphics test - 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6029 -
Video editing score 5429 -
Data manipulation score 4740 -
Photo editing score 8531 -
Writing score 6803 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
No benchmark results yet
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Stelle)AnTuTu 111288870
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Kirillkryt)AnTuTu 111284629
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Ad_545)AnTuTu 111216748

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 632 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 1800 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
Process 14 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 2 billion 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 506 Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Adreno 500 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 725 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 1 4
Shading units 48 64
Total shaders 48 256
FLOPS 69.6 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 11 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 546 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 933 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 1x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 7.5 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 1900 x 1200 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X9 -
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced June 2018 September 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SDM632 APL1W01
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
5 (27.8%)
13 (72.2%)
Total votes: 18

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 632, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!