Snapdragon 685 vs Snapdragon 662

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 11 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 48%) AnTuTu 11 score – 476K vs 320K
  • 40% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~33%)
  • Performs 33% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 22% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 13.9 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
476175
CPU 185342 142183
GPU 28390 23170
Memory 135110 70502
UX 127333 84811
Total score 476175 320666
Samples [83 tests] [13 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 97.1 MB/sec 74.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 29.9 pages/sec 37.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 56.4 Mpixels/sec 38.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 16.5 images/sec 12.8 images/sec
HDR 51.6 Mpixels/sec 41.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.93 images/sec 1.65 images/sec
Photo processing 11.2 images/sec 8.62 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.83 Mpixels/sec 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 30 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 0.34 images/sec 0.28 images/sec
Face detection 0.17 images/sec 0.14 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 29.1 FPS 23.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 18 tests 5 tests

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8747 5767
Video editing score 4745 3680
Data manipulation score 7401 5241
Photo editing score 15136 12485
Writing score 10107 7187
Phones tested 9 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 28 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 30 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 30 FPS
[High]
Device - Xiaomi Poco M3
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (SSAN)AnTuTu508133
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 -> EditaddictsGeekBench CPU485 / 1332
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> EditaddictsAnTuTu445263
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)CPU Throttle94%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)GeekBench GPU385
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kanz)AnTuTu349349
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Wayne)AnTuTu338756
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (arsts)AnTuTu314539
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (Fahim)AnTuTu325691
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-06 (Linode)AnTuTu335094

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 685 and Snapdragon 662

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 6 nanometers 11 nanometers
Transistor count - 1.75 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1260 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 1 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 322.6 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 683

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 13.9 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 390 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2023 January 2020
Class Low end Mid range
Model number SM6225-AD SM6115
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
96 (79.3%)
25 (20.7%)
Total votes: 121

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Snapdragon 685, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anonymous December 11, 2025 at 06:26 PM
Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 = Snapdragon 662 + 100 MHz Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 = Snapdragon 685 + 100 MHz
+7 Reply
Editaddicts September 21, 2026 at 05:18 AM
6s 4g Gen 2= 685 plus 100MHz CPU minus 100MHz GPU
0 Reply