Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Dimensity 8300 – what's better?

Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Dimensity 8300

Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
VS
Dimensity 8300
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (with Adreno 725 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (51)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8300
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.4x)
  • Performs 81% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2910 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 1317K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
vs
Dimensity 8300

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 532680 482670
GPU 166554 432750
Memory 232990 299238
UX 384783 389647
Total score 1317007 1604305
Samples [52 tests] [103 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 182 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 116.1 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 137.9 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 112.4 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 137.2 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16.1 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 40.5 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.62 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 51 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 7.38 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 3.36 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.3 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 772.3 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 614 881
Stability 98% 77%
Graphics test 5 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3688
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1956 2768
Stability 85% -
Graphics test 11 FPS 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14649
Video editing score - 6419
Data manipulation score - 12555
Photo editing score - 23328
Writing score - 18403
Phones tested - 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 59 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Fortnite 38 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 81 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 116 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 114 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco F5
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Bers2409)AnTuTu 121442782
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Q)AnTuTu 121277293
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Rehan shaikh)AnTuTu 111318003
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (MobileEngineer Harway)AnTuTu 111304220
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (Koreia27)AnTuTu 111450376
Add View all (124)
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller)AnTuTu 121893547
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Johan)AnTuTu 121773722
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Josh)AnTuTu 121748777
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Leo Van Bisschop)AnTuTu 122004186
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Cali)AnTuTu 121942368
Add View all (206)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510		 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2910 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 1024 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 10.2 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 725 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture Adreno 700 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 580 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 512 128
Total shaders 1024 768
FLOPS 1187.8 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X62 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4400 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2023 November 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7475-AB MT6897
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1199 (22.3%)
4188 (77.7%)
Total votes: 5387

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (9)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (19)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (27)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (14)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (90)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (6)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (36)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Alex May 16, 2026 at 01:54 PM
7+ gen 2 is not as much weaker as you are showing, it really has a very powerful and optimised cpu which delivers similar cpu performance like the 8+gen1 despite being lower clocked. Cpu is obviously better in Snapdragon 7+gen 2. Now if I talk about the gpu, The gpu is more powerful in dimensity 8300, It's capable to beat adreno 730 and can be said adreno 730+ like. But the adreno 725 in snapdragon is not so much less powerful as your statistics showing. If you give 8300 a 37 out of 100 in gaming, then the snapdragon 7+gen 2 can easily get 30 out of hundreds. Don't trust blindly on antutu,they change their algorithm according to their self created parameters, like they are not focusing on gpu in amtutu 11. As you can see there is a huge change in gpu score of amtutu v11 which is kinda funny now. They are showing adreno 740
0 Reply
Avatar
999 June 10, 2026 at 02:46 PM
The CPU differences are minimal, even the D8300 sometimes shows better score in the antutu V11 and geekbench6 single/multi core. The real difference between the two of these Socs are e the GPU. the gap are massive.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Elizabeth X Llorenza February 19, 2025 at 10:03 AM
if Snapdragon 7+ gen 2 is on your Poco F5, then just use a custom ROM and everything will exceed the default, I always do it from the F1 series, and the results always surprise me
+12 Reply
Avatar
vaibhav September 16, 2024 at 03:32 AM
i have poco f5 it's now 8 months old and i'm thinking to upgrade to X6 pro!! should i gor for ir?
+16 Reply
Avatar
Mitsuhi September 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM
I wouldn't upgrade phones so frequently. Maybe wait for the X7 pro or F7 and with an "early bird" sale or something.
+29 Reply
Avatar
Bruno June 12, 2024 at 12:12 PM
One question, which one would be better to play?
+59 Reply
Avatar
Rex June 19, 2024 at 09:27 AM
Dimensity 83000 will be better at gaming, but it will heat up very quickly. The 7 Plus Gen 2 is a little weaker, but it's stable.
+144 Reply
Avatar
AntoSant April 13, 2024 at 04:11 PM
I'm not a gamer. I just use my phone to browse the internet, watch YouTube, and use WhatsApp. I really regret buying the Poco X6 Pro. It overheats with just normal use. The MediaTek 8300 Ultra is a flawed processor.
+242 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. July 28, 2024 at 07:55 AM
In the first few days if use, it will heat up. It will become stable after a while.
+14 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. August 4, 2024 at 02:21 PM
It's not MediaTek's fault. It's Xiaomi. Xiaomi has very very poor software optimisation that eats up battery doing very minimal tasks. The Poco F6 isn't any better; all because of HyperOS.
+17 Reply
Avatar
cpp December 19, 2024 at 09:57 AM
Thanks for your helpful info.
0 Reply
Avatar
London August 1, 2025 at 06:13 PM
King Miracle., False, I've had this phone since october last year. The phone just performs poorly, my F5 is better but not by that much. I will never buy a Xiaomi again.
0 Reply
Avatar
Jarmin April 11, 2024 at 11:56 AM
Currently, I'm using both the Poco F5 and X6 Pro. To be honest, the performance of the X6 Pro surpasses that of the F5. Specifically, the X6 Pro can run high-graphics games far smoother than the F5.
+104 Reply
Avatar
Lol January 12, 2025 at 09:43 AM
πŸ˜‚X6 Pro better than poco f5?
+10 Reply
Avatar
Madhuban Dubey March 15, 2024 at 05:42 PM
Please update the comparison between 7+ Gen3 and these two: CPU = 8Gen2 and GPU = 8+Gen1. However, optimize the battery for gaming on a cellular network. Expect stable performance in gaming on your own network. It is ranked as follows: 8Gen2 > 7+Gen3 > md8300 > 7+Gen2.
+39 Reply
Avatar
Marlon March 9, 2024 at 12:20 AM
For those who are curious about the POCO X6 Pro (MDTK8300), the build quality, overall performance, battery life, and charging capability are all satisfactory. However, the device tends to overheat, particularly during graphically demanding games such as Farlight 84, Genshin Impact, etc. This issue, however, can be dependent on the surrounding temperature. To combat the heat, I recommend using an electric fan or a phone cooler. In terms of the camera, it's not the best and could benefit from some optimization.
+53 Reply
Avatar
Dubey April 12, 2024 at 06:05 PM
Heating issues during graphic tasks due to the optimal clock frequency of the GPU.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Dario February 18, 2024 at 07:42 PM
The only significant upgrade on the 8300U is the GPU, which is clearly more capable. However, in terms of CPU, they fare equal in sustained performance. Regarding gaming, the superior compatibility of SD chips is indeed beneficial. Given a choice between the Poco F5 and Poco X6 Pro, I'd select the F5 due to its heightened compatibility with emulators. The GPU on the 7th Gen+2 is more than sufficient for gaming on PS2, Wii/GC at 1080p with stable framerates. This also holds true for other games like PUBG, CoD, Fortnite, Apex, etc.
+62 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 29, 2024 at 09:48 AM
Dario, you're right! For emulation and gaming in general, Snapdragon chipsets are always the best. Their performance is similar to PC chipsets like Nvidia, Radeon etc. If I were I given a choice between between Sd 765G and D 9300 devices, I would choice Sd 765G.
+14 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. July 23, 2024 at 08:40 AM
Jay, MediaTek devices are excellent in emulation too. Quit being a fanboy.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Grim Reaper November 10, 2024 at 06:49 PM
Jay, If u choose 765g instead of 9300 u are a DUMBASS!! The raw power itself surpasses the optimisation. Just see the gameplay in warzone mobile.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Higor Miguel T February 10, 2024 at 08:18 PM
How many FLOPS does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra GPU have?
+67 Reply
Avatar
matrix March 10, 2024 at 07:29 AM
GPU flops depend on GPU frequency mostly I think higher GPU frequency is higher gflops.
+10 Reply
Avatar
CΓ©sar dimensity July 19, 2024 at 04:28 PM
10 in touch nunber ably to 14 in water.
0 Reply
Avatar
ShroudMobilegamer January 18, 2024 at 08:32 AM
Even though the MTK 8300 is faster, its poor optimization for games and emulators still makes me choose the 7plus Gen2.
+229 Reply
Avatar
Fahim February 23, 2024 at 02:40 AM
No, the Dimensity 8300 is the best gaming chipset at a lower price point. I'm using it in the Poco X6 Pro. It offers a smooth gaming experience.
+46 Reply
Avatar
HelioG420 March 8, 2024 at 06:00 PM
Fahim, How does it handle PS2 emulation?
+13 Reply
Avatar
Zelda9922 March 29, 2024 at 06:08 AM
HelioG420, Nearly all PS2 games run at full speed and high resolution on the Poco X6 Pro.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 29, 2024 at 09:54 AM
Fahim, The D 8300 may work well for Android games. However, for especially advanced emulation (e.g., Switch emulation), the chip performs terribly. I would suggest that the SD 778G is a superior choice compared to this chip.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 29, 2024 at 10:17 AM
HelioG420, It may perform well. But I strongly advise against using any MediaTek chipsets for emulation. You should use Snapdragon chipsets. If Nanoreview compares Sd 845 to D 8300 Ultra, you would think D 8300 is god of Sd 845, but in reality, especially in reality of emulation, the opposite is true. For example, If you emulate heavy switch games like Red Dead Redemption or Hellblade Senua's Sacrifice in D 8300, the frame rate is first impressive and averages between 70 - 85, then it suddenly drops to 10 then to zero, then the game crashes or lags badly. Snapdragon chipsets are best. They behave like PC chipsets like Nvidia, Radeon and support custom configurations like using drivers which correct defects in games.
+8 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. August 19, 2024 at 01:46 PM
Jay, You're just being a fanboy, Shaming on MediaTek Chipsets for no freaking reason. Get a life, dude.
+18 Reply
Avatar
Rk4 November 26, 2024 at 04:25 PM
Jay, I emulate in both 8300 and 855plus I can say 8300 is significantly better
+3 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee December 31, 2023 at 10:59 AM
Though I appreciate the Dimensity 8300, I wish MediaTek had upgraded the chip by incorporating at least one Cortex X3 core @ 3.25 GHz. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have 3 x Cortex A715 or, preferably, 3 x Cortex A720 @ 3.15 GHz and an efficiency core of 4 x Cortex A520 @ 2.2 GHz. Moreover, I believe the GPU should have been amped up with a Mali G720 MP8 to make it highly competitive, potentially outperforming even the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
+129 Reply
Avatar
Nes V January 4, 2024 at 02:34 PM
It is what it is, that's why the price is that way, if you need cortex 3 then go for Samsung Galaxy s23 ultra or 24 it's that simple
+29 Reply
Avatar
Jackson Steele January 10, 2024 at 02:42 AM
It's already good. Any further improvement will also increase the price and the power consumption.
+33 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee January 14, 2024 at 10:41 AM
Nes V, Well, I was merely expressing a wish. I believe MediaTek chips are excellent and I simply desired that the Dimensity 8300 (or Ultra) would be manufactured in a manner that would enable it to compete with even the best chips offered by Snapdragon. I hope MediaTek updates the Dimensity 8300 by adding an X3 Core and upgrading its GPU further, ideally by adding at least 2 more cores, for example, Mali G615 MP8 or even Mali G720 MP8, or perhaps even MP10.
+10 Reply
Avatar
meecee March 2, 2024 at 01:37 PM
PeeCee, So, you're saying MediaTek should follow the same approach with the 9000 series processor as they do with the 8000 series? In the 9000 series, there's at least one peak performance (X) core, whereas in the 8000 series, efficiency cores are also used as peak performance cores. Moreover, MediaTek uses the 7 series GPU in the 9000 series, while it employs the 6 series GPU in the 8000 series.
+11 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 29, 2024 at 10:20 AM
Don't compare MediaTek chipsets with snapdragon's, which are always the king of the universe.
+7 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. July 4, 2024 at 02:59 PM
Jay, Wrong. Even In this case.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Name December 9, 2023 at 06:54 PM
Please perform an in-game FPS test for the Dimension 8300 Ultra.
+162 Reply
Avatar
NetizenIndonesian November 1, 2024 at 06:53 PM
I watch the GadgetIn in YouTube. He doing test gaming on Poco X6 Pro with D8300U, and amazing, Genshin get 58-59 FPS with highest graphics, and MLBB get 118-119 FPS with ultra graphics and ultra framerate, that's so good, and i think that te best performances in low price. Overall, Poco X6 Pro very recommend for gaming in low price.
0 Reply
Avatar
Madhuban November 22, 2023 at 10:14 AM
Everyone talks to us about SOC's MediaTek vs Qualcomm. So, who actually wins in an all-around comparison? The answer is Dimensity 8300.
+130 Reply
Avatar
SosoSam November 30, 2023 at 06:51 AM
The Gen 2 7+ is powerful enough, although I'm not certain about the efficiency of MediaTek. It seems to force the whole CPU into any task, which causes overheating and uses more power. MediaTek is designed to provide maximum performance in all aspects. The Gen 2 7+ is a highly efficient chip, able to run 8-9 hours of screen-on time (SOT) on the Poco F5, including 1.30 hours of BGMi, plus using YouTube, Facebook, and emails. However, my friend only clocked 6-7 hours SOT with the Iqoo Neo 7, which uses the Dimensity 8200 chip, even with just normal use of YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook.
+107 Reply
Avatar
Cake December 11, 2023 at 09:57 PM
SosoSam, Also, remember that it lies solely with the OEM's battery optimization. The chip can be very efficient, but if the OEM doesn't have good optimization, it will flop.
+60 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee January 14, 2024 at 10:54 AM
SosoSam, I've been using the Poco F5 powered by Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 for a couple of months now, and although the handset doesn't quite seem to reach 8-9 hours of screen-on time (SOT), it does offer substantial longevity. I believe it averages around 6-7 hours of SOT. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 itself is indeed an efficient and robust processor. On a different note, the Poco X6 Pro is a superior phone that surprisingly doesn't cost more than the Poco F5. It comes equipped with the powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset β€” an upgrade over the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Other specifications include LPDDR5X RAM, UFS 4.0, a 1.5K AMOLED display that reaches up to 1800 nits of brightness (compared to Poco F5's 1000 nits), further sweetened by the feature of 120W super-fast charging.
+45 Reply
Avatar
Shabi Abbas January 14, 2024 at 07:19 PM
PeeCee, I've been contemplating which device to purchase for long-term use. By long term, I mean I plan to use the stock ROM for 1-2 years, after which I'll install a custom ROM on the device I choose. So, I've been trying to decide which device would get better support: the Poco F5 (SD7+gen2) or the Poco X6 Pro (mtk8300Ultra). Also, I somewhat agree with the previous person who noted that the MTK heats up. Despite the cold weather in India, reviewers have mentioned that after half an hour of gaming on BGMI (PUBG), the device begins to warm up.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Jana January 25, 2024 at 03:08 PM
Shabi Abbas, MediaTek does not support custom ROM because they do not release a kernel version. Please check YouTube for further information.
+29 Reply
Avatar
Jana January 25, 2024 at 03:10 PM
PeeCee, I'm also a Poco F5 user. Initially, I was somewhat disappointed with my hasty decision to purchase the F5. However, the F5 has proven to be much more robust; it doesn't break like the X6 Pro does. Plus, the F5 comes with a 2-year warranty.
+16 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee January 28, 2024 at 12:59 PM
Jana, Though I haven't personally used the Poco X6 Pro and I'm not entirely sure what you mean, I don't believe it "breaks" easily. I've been completely satisfied with the performance of the Poco F5. However, if someone is looking for a performance-oriented phone, I think the Poco X6 Pro would be the ideal choice for the following reasons: 1. The Poco X6 Pro employs UFS 4.0, which is currently the fastest internal storage available for smartphones. 2. It boasts LPDDR5X RAM. This is faster and more efficient than its predecessor, LPDDR5 RAM. The only RAM currently superior to LPDDR5X is LPDDR5T, which is used by very few phones, a couple of Vivo models, I believe. 3. The Poco X6 Pro harnesses the power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset. This is a highly competent and fast SoC. It's almost as swift as a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and certainly faster than a Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2. Therefore, I'd likely choose the Poco X6 Pro over the Poco F5 due to its superior system on a chip (SoC), speedier RAM, and internal storage.
+67 Reply
Avatar
taotao March 16, 2024 at 01:11 AM
Jana, That's fake. Companies typically refrain from releasing kernel sources. We already have the x6 pro (duchamp-d8300 ultra) source code on GitHub from Xiaomi: https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/tree/bsp-duchamp-u-oss However, we need to see how they handle ROMs, etc. because there's usually a problem. Typically, MTK has some functional issues, and it's easy for the system to crash. For now and for about 1-2 years, it's not the best option for customization. However, after (or perhaps even before) a year, you might be able to find a usable custom ROM like Lineage OS. The same was said for d8100, and x4 gt (d8100, I forgot the codename) ended up having a custom ROM after all. So, choose based on your preference. Generally, if you're planning to use emulators/custom ROMs, just go for f5; if not, wait for developers to create a custom ROM for x6 pro, and stay tuned for emulation news regarding MTK – we might hear something promising this year or the next, although nothing is certain.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 29, 2024 at 10:21 AM
You are right but only in theory.
+21 Reply
EnglishРусский