Dimensity 7200 vs Dimensity 7050

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (with Mali-G610 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 7050 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 971K vs 806K
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
971424
CPU 362430 310680
GPU 148984 80663
Memory 169068 176922
UX 290942 237747
Total score 971424 806012
Samples [37 tests] [29 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 127.3 MB/sec 117.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.9 pages/sec 61.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 86.6 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 42.2 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
HDR 76.7 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.69 images/sec 6.71 images/sec
Photo processing 21.9 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.36 Mpixels/sec 3.21 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.06 images/sec 3.79 images/sec
Face detection 2.89 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.3 Gpixels/sec 7.13 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 909.5 FPS 393.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 4 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 447 233
Stability - 97%
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1158 -
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 6 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 9630
Video editing score - 5765
Data manipulation score - 8000
Photo editing score - 28539
Writing score - 15985
Phones tested - 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu1003769
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (note8techh)AnTuTu984744
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 -> HuuPhatAnTuTu996454
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (Jedrick)AnTuTu843534
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy)AnTuTu839005
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Arda1)AnTuTu874742
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Thun)AnTuTu823369
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-07 (Berto V.)CPU Throttle88%

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7200 and Dimensity 7050

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP4 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 1130 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 64 32
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 578.6 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 650 MediaTek APU 550

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 May 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6886 MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7050 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7400 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1764 (82.7%)
368 (17.3%)
Total votes: 2132

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7050 and Dimensity 7200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anandan December 31, 2024 at 09:41 AM
below 15k the best processor is demensity 7050, but demensity 7200 get only up to 20k.
+7 Reply