Snapdragon 835 vs Snapdragon 685

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (with Adreno 540 graphics) and Snapdragon 685 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
  • Supports 75% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 17 GB/s)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
  • Higher GPU frequency (~77%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 10 nm)
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2450 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 476K vs 438K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
476175
CPU 148324 185342
GPU 101521 28390
Memory 88938 135110
UX 99233 127333
Total score 438016 476175
Samples Less than 3 [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 87.1 MB/sec 97.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.5 pages/sec 29.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 56.7 Mpixels/sec 56.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 15.6 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
HDR 48.2 Mpixels/sec 51.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.93 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Photo processing 11 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.23 Mpixels/sec 2.83 Mpixels/sec
Samples 2 tests 30 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.08 images/sec 0.34 images/sec
Face detection 1.3 images/sec 0.17 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.03 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 105.3 FPS 29.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples - 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 368 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 5581 8747
Video editing score 5841 4745
Data manipulation score 5696 7401
Photo editing score 13302 15136
Writing score 7633 10107
Phones tested - 9 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-13 (Lee)Geekbench 6 CPU382 / 1166
πŸ“˜ 2023-09-25 (Nightshot)Geekbench 6 CPU427 / 1500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 -> EditaddictsAnTuTu 12490504
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Breno)Geekbench 7 CPU496 / 1737
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Breno)AnTuTu 12598375
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Ig1000)AnTuTu 12527229
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Ary)AnTuTu 12557806

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 835 and Snapdragon 685

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.45 GHz – Kryo 280 (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 280 (Cortex-A53)
4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2450 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 10 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 540 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 500 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 710 MHz 1260 MHz
Pipelines 4 1
Shading units 64 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 363.5 Gigaflops 322.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 11 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 682 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 29.8 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X16 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 16 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 1000 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2016 March 2023
Class Flagship Low end
Model number MSM8998 SM6225-AD
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
126 (58.1%)
91 (41.9%)
Total votes: 217

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 685 and Snapdragon 835, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Felix M August 21, 2024 at 02:08 PM
The 685 is kind of a joke but also kind of impressive, considering what Qualcomm has done with this architecture. It started with the 660, then 662, 665, 632 etc. However, in 2024, it's time they retire this design. The A73 is dead; it should be left to rest in peace. The A76 should be adopted as the bare minimum in 2024.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Snap dragon 835 and 685 August 15, 2024 at 10:33 AM
Used both but the thing I noticed snap dragon 835 is faster like alot faster but it warms up more than the 685 while playing games
+19 Reply