Snapdragon 865 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650) with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  • Performs 57% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2490 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 978K vs 895K
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~92%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
978910
895627
CPU 385127 309104
GPU 148169 144993
Memory 166070 139578
UX 279544 301952
Total score 978910 895627
Samples [104 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A12 Bionic +13%
1318
Multi-Core Score
3191
3134
Asset compression 149.1 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 87.2 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 125.3 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 77 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 106.3 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 32.7 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.29 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 52 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A12 Bionic +90%
7868
Background blur 4.53 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 1.97 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.05 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 567.3 FPS 608.2 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 34 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A12 Bionic +34%
1482
Score 1110 1482
Stability 99% 65%
Graphics test 6 FPS 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9557 -
Video editing score 5874 -
Data manipulation score 8658 -
Photo editing score 29642 -
Writing score 14782 -
Phones tested 14 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 61 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 30 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-27 (MAPKIS)AnTuTu 121102560
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (the kroco's)AnTuTu 121088974
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-22 (mptech)AnTuTu 11995050
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-20 (mptech)AnTuTu 11973656
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-18 (heedneas)AnTuTu 121160558
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU1344 / 4757
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-31 (ะ”ะธะผะฐ)AnTuTu 11644981
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 GPU7868
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 CPU1306 / 2770
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu 11756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz โ€“ Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz โ€“ Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.49 GHz โ€“ Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz โ€“ Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 650 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 587 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 901.6 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AACโ€‘LC
- AAX ะธ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HEโ€‘AAC
- HEโ€‘AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X55 Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2019 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8250-AB APL1W81
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1592 (53.9%)
1363 (46.1%)
Total votes: 2955

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 865, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Leo October 18, 2023 at 11:55 AM
Should I go for the iPhone XS Max or Mi 10 Ultra? Alternatively, is there any other phone under $300 that you would recommend? My main priorities are a high-quality camera and smooth FPS gaming performance.
+20 Reply
Avatar
BrokeCashier May 2, 2025 at 11:26 PM
iPhone XS. I'm using one and it's a perfect compact phone for gaming and camera. Bought it for 200$ in November 2023.
0 Reply
Avatar
Shane smith. July 13, 2020 at 01:52 AM
S20 ultra has zero lag in pubg. Hell my s10 plus didnโ€™t have any lag!
+131 Reply
Avatar
Rahul gujjar July 1, 2020 at 06:27 AM
A12 bionic chip is the best , performance in pubg mobile gaming playing with 0 :lag then a12 is better then snapdragon 865 ?
+359 Reply
Avatar
Prabhat February 15, 2021 at 08:18 PM
Useless a12. Only because of optimization it runs smoothly
+35 Reply
Avatar
bruh March 15, 2021 at 04:01 AM
Prabhat, "only because of optimization" lol salty cause the people who make snapdragon phones don't optimize it as much as apple optimizes their in house chips
+24 Reply
Avatar
Lmao March 29, 2021 at 10:48 AM
bruh, Maybe in pubg because it was optimize d.. but in genshin impact bruh even the a13 can't handle the game that much not even close to the SD865
+35 Reply
Avatar
Dig May 11, 2021 at 06:13 PM
Lmao, I don't care about games for little girls.
+11 Reply
Avatar
chiranjeet August 18, 2021 at 07:07 PM
Lmao, optimization in pubg cod is better in ios
+22 Reply
Avatar
GTG October 12, 2023 at 03:55 PM
chiranjeet, Be specific, which iOS?
+2 Reply
Avatar
Meow June 2, 2024 at 05:24 AM
chiranjeet, Yeah, it's way better optimized for iOS. ๐Ÿคก
+5 Reply
Avatar
HelioG420 September 16, 2024 at 07:19 PM
Dig, You're denying the fact that the snapdragon is performing better because of a "game for little girls", it's a game that was used foe benchmarking, it doesn't matter if it's for little girls or grown up men.
+3 Reply
Avatar
BrokeCashier May 2, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Prabhat, @Prabhat We can literally see A12 having higher GPU score than SD865. It's not due to optimization. A12 simply has more powerful GPU than SD865.
+1 Reply