Snapdragon 888 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (Adreno 660) with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 27%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1135K vs 895K
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2490 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~34%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1135878
895627
CPU 406119 309104
GPU 233383 144993
Memory 188085 139578
UX 308291 301952
Total score 1135878 895627
Samples [127 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1500
1318
Multi-Core Score
3537
3134
Asset compression 156.9 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 86.4 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 104.6 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 72.9 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 104.7 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.1 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.04 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A12 Bionic +74%
7868
Background blur 7.75 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 3.37 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 13.1 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 851.2 FPS 608.2 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 19 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 505 -
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1508
1482
Score 1508 1482
Stability 91% 65%
Graphics test 9 FPS 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12232 -
Video editing score 7638 -
Data manipulation score 10494 -
Photo editing score 29866 -
Writing score 15219 -
Phones tested 11 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 83 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 112 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Zha)AnTuTu 12976692
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekbench 6 CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu 111210861
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU1344 / 4757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Π”ΠΈΠΌΠ°)AnTuTu 11644981
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 GPU7868
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 CPU1306 / 2770
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu 11756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 660 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 1290.2 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 780 Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAC‑LC
- AAX ΠΈ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HE‑AAC
- HE‑AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X60 Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2020 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8350 APL1W81
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
839 (64.8%)
455 (35.2%)
Total votes: 1294

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 888, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
BrokeCashier June 11, 2025 at 11:19 AM
So it took Qualcomm 3 years to beat the A12 Bionic. Damn! Apple is so far ahead in their chipset design.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Bob June 19, 2025 at 08:26 PM
You are right. But on now days, snapdragon beats the hell outta apple
+11 Reply