Exynos 1480 vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1480 (with Samsung Xclipse 530 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Shows significantly better (up to 73%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1021K vs 592K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
  • Performs 55% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • 25% higher CPU clock speed (2750 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
CPU 348485 237904
GPU 226076 56314
Memory 182794 136317
UX 264381 161480
Total score 1021736 592015
Samples [38 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1137
Multi-Core Score
3437
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1480 +192%
4101
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 245.1 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 459 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 1480 +173%
982
Score 982 360
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 5 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13134
Web score 11788 9704
Video editing score 7255 3911
Data manipulation score 10941 8663
Photo editing score 23283 18151
Writing score 17673 13129
Phones tested Less than 3 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu 111080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu 111062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2750 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Adreno 619
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 1 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 128 256
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2024 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8845 SM6375
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
51 (70.8%)
21 (29.2%)
Total votes: 72

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!