Exynos 1580 vs Dimensity 8200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1580 (with Samsung Xclipse 540 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1580
  • Performs 82% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~37%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8200
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2900 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1251512
1240821
CPU 490457 428145
GPU 296896 233006
Memory 173263 267125
UX 290896 312545
Total score 1251512 1240821
Samples [139 tests] [73 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1356
Multi-Core Score
3962
Asset compression 187.2 MB/sec 172.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 98.5 pages/sec 108 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 140.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 73.4 images/sec 86.2 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 118.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.9 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 34.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.13 Mpixels/sec 4.63 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 28 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
6878
Background blur 13.8 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Face detection 6.57 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.7 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 727.6 FPS 955.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 15 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 655 626
Stability 98% 97%
Graphics test 5 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1788
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12979
13348
Web score 12398 11474
Video editing score 7114 5571
Data manipulation score 10983 10859
Photo editing score 23206 32165
Writing score 16063 20448
Phones tested 3 models 11 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 GPU5755
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 CPU1191 / 3814
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)AnTuTu 121017323
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> CR7AnTuTu 121030440
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> Regenis0AnTuTu 121470608
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Jagannath Bhadra)AnTuTu 121274406
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> chmakAnTuTu 121394231
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Kubyshko)AnTuTu 111130854
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_Geekbench 6 GPU4860

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1580 and Dimensity 8200

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 512 KB -
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 540 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 256 384
FLOPS 1331.2 Gigaflops 729.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 580
NPU theoretical performance 14.7 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 December 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8855 MT6896Z
Official page Samsung Exynos 1580 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
120 (54.1%)
102 (45.9%)
Total votes: 222

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8200 and Exynos 1580, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
ITZVIKTOH_77 June 11, 2025 at 05:18 PM
The Exynos 1580 seems to be the better option even with the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 scoring higher in antutu 10, but exynos 1580 is slightly better in geekbench 6
+7 Reply
Avatar
Zan February 14, 2026 at 07:43 AM
but the max bandwidth though it's small 25 vs 51 double the max output
0 Reply