Exynos 1680 vs Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1680 (with Samsung Xclipse 550 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1680
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 75% better in floating-point computations
  • 16% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1604K vs 1390K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1390055
1604305
CPU 510705 482670
GPU 374535 432750
Memory 204469 299238
UX 300346 389647
Total score 1390055 1604305
Samples [14 tests] [103 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1382
Multi-Core Score
4477
Asset compression 212.5 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 125.8 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 144.7 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 86.1 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 141.1 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 18 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 39.6 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.87 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
7924
Background blur 13.3 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 6.4 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.33 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 31.6 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 958.9 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 881
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3688
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2768
Graphics test - 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14649
Video editing score - 6419
Data manipulation score - 12555
Photo editing score - 23328
Writing score - 18403
Phones tested - 2 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1680
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Anonim)AnTuTu 111375246
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HaiLong0510AnTuTu 121533019
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Darck)AnTuTu 111348067
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-04 -> HaiLong0510AnTuTu 111434648
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Mehedi)AnTuTu 111351187
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (INDONESIA #1 CORRUPTION!!!!)AnTuTu 122078431
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Toni)AnTuTu 121997354
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Toni)AnTuTu 121886537
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Wowok)AnTuTu 122108625
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Yuno)AnTuTu 122214593

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A520
1x 3.35 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 550 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 1200 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 768
FLOPS 1228.8 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
NPU theoretical performance 19.6 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 5348 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.1 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2026 November 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8865 MT6897
Official page Samsung Exynos 1680 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
19 (17%)
93 (83%)
Total votes: 112

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Exynos 1680, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
OppoEXtra September 28, 2026 at 04:00 PM
The Exynos 1680 still loses to a 3-year-old chip LMAO. But honestly, the Dimensity 8300 is still an absolute beast.
0 Reply
Avatar
IT man in south korea May 5, 2026 at 02:22 PM
Galaxy A58 that will be launched in 2027 will win poco x6 pro with dimensity 8300 Ultra launched in 2024. Amazing.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Viva la quallera June 25, 2026 at 07:22 AM
The 8300 is much better thanks to tsmc and the better gpu
+1 Reply
Avatar
Atรญpico April 25, 2026 at 01:11 PM
Even after 3 years, that's a shame, Samsung.
+1 Reply
Avatar
VIKTร˜H April 2, 2026 at 05:47 PM
If exynos had better optimization the gaming score would have gone up
+4 Reply
Avatar
person March 29, 2026 at 12:48 PM
It is such a shame that Exynos' optimization sucked :/
+5 Reply