Exynos 2400e vs Tensor G4

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400e (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 8-core Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400e
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1977K vs 1519K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~16%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1977269
1519937
CPU 675682 536742
GPU 670589 414930
Memory 229976 215572
UX 401022 352693
Total score 1977269 1519937
Samples [56 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2045
1707
Multi-Core Score
6397
4431
Asset compression 270.2 MB/sec 177.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 202.5 pages/sec 134 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 196.6 Mpixels/sec 157 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 150.7 images/sec 122 images/sec
HDR 200.6 Mpixels/sec 128.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.6 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Photo processing 59.3 images/sec 39.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.7 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 24 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
16611
8744
Background blur 27.9 images/sec 13.4 images/sec
Face detection 16.6 images/sec 8.51 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.74 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 50.5 Gpixels/sec 26.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2483.5 FPS 1273.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 21 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
1049
Score 1769 1049
Stability 70% 84%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7699 -
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 35 FPS -
Section 2 28 FPS -
Section 3 24 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16227
13174
Web score 15997 10521
Video editing score 8031 7569
Data manipulation score 12347 14718
Photo editing score 33878 21074
Writing score 19836 15880
Phones tested Less than 3 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekBench CPU2014 / 6373
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Digansh Y)AnTuTu2052468
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-24 (Vaqqas)AnTuTu1860306
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu1626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu1590049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu1723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)GeekBench GPU8744
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)GeekBench CPU1674 / 4114

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400e and Tensor G4

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3110 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 940 MHz
Pipelines 6 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 896
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1684.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5400c
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 9640 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 2550 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2024 August 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - GS401 (S5P9875)
Successor - - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
76 (90.5%)
8 (9.5%)
Total votes: 84

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G4 and Exynos 2400e, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!