Exynos 8890 vs Exynos 2200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 8890 (with Mali-T880 MP12 graphics) and Exynos 2200 (Samsung Xclipse 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 14 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.5x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 413K
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2x)
  • Supports 78% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 28.8 GB/s)
  • 22% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
413736
Exynos 2200 +247%
1434169
CPU 154274 472427
GPU 45659 390230
Memory 112058 216173
UX 101745 355339
Total score 413736 1434169
Samples [4 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +285%
1588
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +259%
3958
Asset compression 60.6 MB/sec 169.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 37 pages/sec 103 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 35.6 Mpixels/sec 133.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 11.3 images/sec 101.3 images/sec
HDR 41.1 Mpixels/sec 130.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.96 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 8.37 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.93 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +786%
10088
Background blur 1.12 images/sec 14.6 images/sec
Face detection 0.55 images/sec 9.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.48 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.14 Gpixels/sec 38.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 147.9 FPS 1860.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 3 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 900
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3972
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 15 FPS
Section 1 - 18 FPS
Section 2 - 15 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1918
Stability - 64%
Graphics test - 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 11932
Video editing score - 7385
Data manipulation score - 12323
Photo editing score - 24230
Writing score - 16664
Phones tested - 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 8890
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 -> weedsmoker9000Geekbench 7 CPU408 / 1214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Juvi)AnTuTu 12508312
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Zeroshka)AnTuTu 11413736
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (ДСнис)AnTuTu 11418077
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-16 (Youssef)AnTuTu 11397832
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> MihneaGeekbench 7 CPU1390 / 3641
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> MihneaAnTuTu 121661485
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 -> PixelixAnTuTu 121820994
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 -> PixelixAnTuTu 121786295
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-19 (Π“Π»Π΅Π±)AnTuTu 121691092

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 8890 and Exynos 2200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Mongoose M1
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 384 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 14 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 2 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-T880 MP12 Samsung Xclipse 920
Architecture Midgard 4th gen RDNA 2
GPU frequency 650 MHz 1306 MHz
Pipelines 12 3
Shading units 21 128
Total shaders 252 384
FLOPS 327.6 Gigaflops 1003 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.3
OpenCL version 1.2 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) No Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.8 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 4 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 24MP, 2x 12MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 4.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2015 January 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SGA8890A S5E9925
Official page Samsung Exynos 8890 official site Samsung Exynos 2200 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2200 and Exynos 8890, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!