Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 662

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 11 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 355K vs 320K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  • Performs 4x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
  • Supports 9% higher memory bandwidth (13.9 against 12.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
CPU 146634 142183
GPU 30478 23170
Memory 82437 70502
UX 95802 84811
Total score 355351 320666
Samples [17 tests] [13 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
1107
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 74.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 37.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 38.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 12.8 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 41.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 1.65 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 8.62 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 9611 +385%
1474
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 0.28 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 0.14 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 23.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 9 tests 5 tests

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
6307
Web score 5186 5767
Video editing score 5099 3680
Data manipulation score 4791 5241
Photo editing score 10017 12485
Writing score 6916 7187
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
28 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
30 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
30 FPS
[High]
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco M3
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Doc)AnTuTu 11352951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Haluk)AnTuTu 11311605
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu 11357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu 11331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu 11298360
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Absabsabsbsa)AnTuTu 12391827
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kanz)AnTuTu 11349349
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Wayne)AnTuTu 11338756
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (arsts)AnTuTu 11314539
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (Fahim)AnTuTu 11325691

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Snapdragon 662

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
Process 10 nanometers 11 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 1.75 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Adreno 610
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 850 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 3 1
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 36 128
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 683

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 13.9 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2019 January 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 SM6115
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2035 (50.1%)
2028 (49.9%)
Total votes: 4063

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Handa September 29, 2026 at 05:48 PM
Snapdragon is better
0 Reply
Avatar
Nightshot February 3, 2024 at 02:27 PM
Also, Exynos 9611 GPU is clocked at precisely 1053MHz. Not 850MHz.
+2 Reply
Serhii February 5, 2024 at 02:33 PM
Wikipedia says 850 MHz gpu clock, not 1053 MHz. Thank you for your comment.
0 Reply
Avatar
Nightshot February 23, 2024 at 01:50 AM
Serhii, Wikipedia is full of shit. I own a Tab S6 Lite and can prove it's 1053MHz.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Nightshot February 23, 2024 at 01:53 AM
Serhii, The frequency step of 850MHz doesn't even exist in the GPU table. The three highest performance states of the GPU are 839, 949, and 1053. It's clocked exceptionally high to compensate for the low amount of cores.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Nightshot February 3, 2024 at 02:26 PM
Exynos 9611 is faster but throttles very fast and becomes slower.
+2 Reply
Avatar
HouseRat March 16, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Snapdragon is better
+48 Reply
Avatar
stupids January 25, 2021 at 10:31 AM
I think the snapdragon 662 is better, because the WiFi connection is better (6) and bluetooth is better toon (5.1).
+23 Reply
Avatar
King January 28, 2021 at 12:53 PM
Sd 460 has bluetooth and wifi connectivity better than Sd 845,then can sd 460 become good processor than sd 845?
+36 Reply
Avatar
Wews May 18, 2021 at 03:47 PM
King, for social media a bit, but in gaming no
+7 Reply
Avatar
Not ur mom December 30, 2020 at 01:52 AM
They're both good, but the Exynos is a little better.
+18 Reply
Avatar
guest_946 December 11, 2020 at 02:48 PM
I am a Samsung user. I will say that I am happy with exynos. Snapdragop is nothing but a room heater.
+46 Reply
Avatar
Nono December 14, 2020 at 07:43 AM
I think you are wrong sir! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hmvfzDTywt4
+25 Reply
Avatar
pedram December 31, 2020 at 06:35 PM
Nono, compare exynos 9611 vs snap 662 ! your youtube link is about note 20 ! are u ok ?
+13 Reply
Avatar
Vivek January 8, 2021 at 09:30 AM
Haha really 🀣 at least it doesn’t hang linke sumsung makes their customers feel of living in a hang life πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
+14 Reply
Avatar
Hitler February 9, 2021 at 01:44 PM
This Exynos processor can't even compete wih sd662 which is provided in phones pricing below 12k
+3 Reply
Avatar
None October 14, 2021 at 08:17 PM
I am samsung user , it's the worst phone.
+2 Reply