Exynos 9611 vs Exynos 1580

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Exynos 1580 (Samsung Xclipse 540). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1580
  • Performs 21.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.5x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1251K vs 355K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 10 nm)
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 12.8 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~53%)
  • 26% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
Exynos 1580 +252%
1251512
CPU 146634 490457
GPU 30478 296896
Memory 82437 173263
UX 95802 290896
Total score 355351 1251512
Samples [17 tests] [139 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 1580 +272%
1356
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 1580 +251%
3888
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 187.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 98.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 138.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 73.4 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 119.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 15.9 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 5.13 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1580 +367%
6878
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 13.8 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 6.57 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 30.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 727.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 9 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 655
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 1580 +113%
12979
Web score 5186 12398
Video editing score 5099 7114
Data manipulation score 4791 10983
Photo editing score 10017 23206
Writing score 6916 16063
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Doc)AnTuTu 11352951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Haluk)AnTuTu 11311605
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu 11357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu 11331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu 11298360
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 GPU5755
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 CPU1191 / 3814
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)AnTuTu 121017323
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> CR7AnTuTu 121030440

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Exynos 1580

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache - 512 KB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 10 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Samsung Xclipse 540
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen RDNA 3
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 36 256
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 1331.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.4
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 14.7 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 5100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2019 October 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 S5E8855
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Samsung Exynos 1580 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2 (9.1%)
20 (90.9%)
Total votes: 22

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1580 and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!