Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 750G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Performs 6.7x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 59%) AnTuTu 11 score – 566K vs 355K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 10 nm)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 12.8 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
566483
CPU 146634 242759
GPU 30478 50920
Memory 82437 92020
UX 95802 180784
Total score 355351 566483
Samples [17 tests] [8 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
1882
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 158.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 67.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 111.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 55.2 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 94.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 10.2 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 3.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1474
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 5.05 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 2.58 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 3.29 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 242.4 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 9 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 333
Graphics test - 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
8898
Web score 5186 7576
Video editing score 5099 6985
Data manipulation score 4791 7680
Photo editing score 10017 19274
Writing score 6916 8986
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
58 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
37 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends - 61 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Doc)AnTuTu 11352951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Haluk)AnTuTu 11311605
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu 11357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu 11331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu 11298360
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 1875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)AnTuTu 11556264
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Erick Silva)AnTuTu 11599951
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Breno)AnTuTu 11614247
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (JΓ£o)AnTuTu 11579715

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Snapdragon 750G

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.3-A
L3 cache - 3 MB
Process 10 nanometers 8 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Adreno 619
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 850 MHz 800 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 36 256
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 409.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 694

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 X52
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2019 September 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 SM7225
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
141 (17.5%)
664 (82.5%)
Total votes: 805

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 750G and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Aditya October 2, 2024 at 04:51 PM
I am using samsung galaxy m21 and how to root is this phone without using pc m?
0 Reply