Exynos 9611 vs Exynos 1680

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Exynos 1680 (Samsung Xclipse 550). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1680
  • Performs 20.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.9x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1390K vs 355K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 10 nm)
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 12.8 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~41%)
  • 26% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
Exynos 1680 +291%
1390055
CPU 146634 510705
GPU 30478 374535
Memory 82437 204469
UX 95802 300346
Total score 355351 1390055
Samples [17 tests] [14 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 1680 +279%
1382
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 1680 +304%
4477
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 212.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 125.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 144.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 86.1 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 141.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 18 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 39.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 5.87 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1680 +438%
7924
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 13.3 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 6.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.33 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.42 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 31.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 958.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 9 tests 2 tests

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 5186 -
Video editing score 5099 -
Data manipulation score 4791 -
Photo editing score 10017 -
Writing score 6916 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Doc)AnTuTu 11352951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Haluk)AnTuTu 11311605
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu 11357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu 11331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu 11298360
Samsung Exynos 1680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-28 (Fazar)AnTuTu 121550733
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (Haste)AnTuTu 121622246
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-23 -> dimitar_05Geekbench 7 GPU2330
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-23 -> dimitar_05Geekbench 7 CPU1215 / 4373
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 -> dimitar_05AnTuTu 121531135

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Exynos 1680

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
Process 10 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Samsung Xclipse 550
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen RDNA 3
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1200 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 36 256
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 1228.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.4
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 19.6 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 Shannon 5348
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 5100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 6.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2019 March 2026
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 S5E8865
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Samsung Exynos 1680 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1680 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1680 and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!