Exynos 9820 vs Snapdragon 855

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9820 (with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9820
  • Higher GPU frequency (~20%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 824K vs 744K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
744321
824513
CPU 297306 314517
GPU 132919 125449
Memory 146753 150134
UX 167343 234413
Total score 744321 824513
Samples [42 tests] [39 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2731
Asset compression 114.9 MB/sec 126.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 69.4 pages/sec 74.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 69 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.9 images/sec 57.7 images/sec
HDR 72.5 Mpixels/sec 89.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.34 images/sec 9.07 images/sec
Photo processing 18.1 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.83 Mpixels/sec 4.06 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4812
Background blur 7.03 images/sec 4.31 images/sec
Face detection 4.35 images/sec 1.84 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 14.5 Gpixels/sec 8.72 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 739.3 FPS 444 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 5 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 367 -
Stability 81% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 950 876
Stability 82% 86%
Graphics test 5 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10497
Web score 7478 8813
Video editing score 5765 5956
Data manipulation score 7575 8239
Photo editing score 18093 22485
Writing score 10112 13084
Phones tested 3 models 8 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)CPU Throttle76%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)AnTuTu 11717771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Arifz)AnTuTu 12769471
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Lurky)AnTuTu 12932812
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Rip)AnTuTu 12625310
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 GPU3882

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 855

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Mongoose M4
2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 8.5 billion 6.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Adreno 640
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 702 MHz 585 MHz
Pipelines 12 3
Shading units 24 256
Total shaders 288 768
FLOPS 404.4 Gigaflops 898.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 690

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 34.13 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5100 X24 LTE, X50 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 20
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 5000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 1240 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced November 2018 December 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9820 SM8150
Official page Samsung Exynos 9820 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1095 (37.2%)
1849 (62.8%)
Total votes: 2944

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Samsung user August 11, 2023 at 12:33 AM
Exynos 9820 now is better in the long term. same performance and efficiency after updates custom rom support and better optimization.
+258 Reply
Avatar
samsung user too February 16, 2025 at 08:10 PM
Most app developers don't optimize their apps to run on chipsets other than Snapdragon. No matter how well Exynos runs on the Samsung One UI ecosystem, only Samsung-made apps would run best on Exynos, and perhaps a tiny amount of other apps. Exynos is a good Samsung project that is meant to be superior to Snapdragon and MediaTek. It actually does... it's just not supported by the rest of the ecosystem outside of Samsung.
+19 Reply