Exynos 9820 vs Exynos 2500

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 9820 (Mali-G76 MP12) with the newer 10-core Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Performs 10.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.1x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2289K vs 744K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 8 nm)
  • Supports 125% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~42%)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • 21% higher CPU clock speed (3300 vs 2730 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
744321
Exynos 2500 +208%
2289696
CPU 297306 771016
GPU 132919 723824
Memory 146753 356421
UX 167343 438435
Total score 744321 2289696
Samples [42 tests] [8 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2500 +127%
2285
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2500 +191%
7874
Asset compression 114.9 MB/sec 390.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 69.4 pages/sec 179.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 69 Mpixels/sec 218.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.9 images/sec 247.5 images/sec
HDR 72.5 Mpixels/sec 309 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.34 images/sec 36.4 images/sec
Photo processing 18.1 images/sec 89.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.83 Mpixels/sec 12.7 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2500 +292%
18873
Background blur 7.03 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 4.35 images/sec 15.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.7 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.24 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 14.5 Gpixels/sec 82.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 739.3 FPS 3446.8 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 5 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2500 +508%
2231
Score 367 2231
Stability 81% 54%
Graphics test 3 FPS 17 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 9397
Graphics test - 36 FPS
Section 1 - 43 FPS
Section 2 - 35 FPS
Section 3 - 29 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 950 -
Stability 82% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16035
Web score 7478 15720
Video editing score 5765 8133
Data manipulation score 7575 11954
Photo editing score 18093 32035
Writing score 10112 22532
Phones tested 3 models Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)CPU Throttle76%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)AnTuTu 11717771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Arifz)AnTuTu 12769471
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Lurky)AnTuTu 12932812
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Rip)AnTuTu 12625310
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Exynos 2500

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Mongoose M4
2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 8 10
Frequency 2730 MHz 3300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L3 cache - 16 MB
Process 8 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 8.5 billion -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Samsung Xclipse 950
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen RDNA 3
GPU frequency 702 MHz 999 MHz
Pipelines 12 8
Shading units 24 128
Total shaders 288 1024
FLOPS 404.4 Gigaflops 4091.9 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.4
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 59 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5100 Exynos 5400
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 12100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2018 June 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9820 S5E9955
Official page Samsung Exynos 9820 official site Samsung Exynos 2500 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2500 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!