Exynos 990 vs Kirin 990 (5G)

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) (Mali-G76 MP16). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Higher GPU frequency (~39%)
  • Performs 27% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.1 GB/s)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G)
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2860 vs 2730 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
907140
CPU 370196 370957
GPU 130687 142673
Memory 151878 172126
UX 254379 202120
Total score 907140 887876
Samples [50 tests] [7 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +20%
1222
Multi-Core Score
3060
3387
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 146.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 82.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 114.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 68.9 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 100.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 12.1 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.44 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 7.73 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 4.68 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 16.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 628.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1416 -
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 8 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10705 -
Video editing score 6884 -
Data manipulation score 8823 -
Photo editing score 30928 -
Writing score 11422 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 30 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Huawei Honor 30 Pro Plus
1200 x 2640
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Ctvy970)AnTuTu 11922959
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Nikotik)AnTuTu 11891785
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)CPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)AnTuTu 11823339
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-24 (Maestro)AnTuTu 11827011
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-30 (AMK)Geekbench 6 CPU1018 / 3387

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Kirin 990 (5G)

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2860 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G76 MP16
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 600 MHz
Pipelines 11 16
Shading units 32 24
Total shaders 352 384
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 460.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Da Vinci
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VC-1
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Announced October 2019 October 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
435 (50.9%)
419 (49.1%)
Total votes: 854

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 990 (5G) and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anon November 16, 2024 at 08:22 PM
Is no one questioning how Both of these are called 990 and both launched in the same month of the same year? And they both have similar performance!!!!
+7 Reply
Avatar
Agriya March 7, 2021 at 02:53 AM
Comparing the Australian S20 to the Huawei P40 and the Huawei is definitely better for a phone that's $1000 AUD less
+18 Reply