Exynos 990 vs Exynos 2200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Exynos 2200 (Samsung Xclipse 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 990
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Performs 71% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~57%)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 58%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 907K
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
907140
1434169
CPU 370196 472427
GPU 130687 390230
Memory 151878 216173
UX 254379 355339
Total score 907140 1434169
Samples [50 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1222
1588
Multi-Core Score
3060
3958
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 169.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 103 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 133.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 101.3 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 130.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5261
10088
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 14.6 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 9.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.48 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 38.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 1860.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2200 +130%
900
Score 391 900
Stability 73% 66%
Graphics test 3 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3972
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 15 FPS
Section 1 - 18 FPS
Section 2 - 15 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1416
1918
Score 1416 1918
Stability 65% 64%
Graphics test 8 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11402
13460
Web score 10705 11932
Video editing score 6884 7385
Data manipulation score 8823 12323
Photo editing score 30928 24230
Writing score 11422 16664
Phones tested 6 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 ((tiktok:frowners_tech_))AnTuTu 121674395
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Exynos 2200

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB 4 MB
Process 7 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Samsung Xclipse 920
Architecture Valhall 1st gen RDNA 2
GPU frequency 832 MHz 1306 MHz
Pipelines 11 3
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 352 384
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 1003 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 January 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 S5E9925
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Samsung Exynos 2200 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
18 (14.1%)
110 (85.9%)
Total votes: 128

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2200 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!