Exynos 990 vs Snapdragon 855

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Higher GPU frequency (~42%)
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.13 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 824K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 53% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +10%
907140
CPU 370196 314517
GPU 130687 125449
Memory 151878 150134
UX 254379 234413
Total score 907140 824513
Samples [50 tests] [39 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +26%
1222
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 990 +12%
3060
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 126.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 74.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 57.7 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 89.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 9.07 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.06 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +95%
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 4.31 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 1.84 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 8.72 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 444 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 8 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 990 +62%
1416
Score 1416 876
Stability 65% 86%
Graphics test 8 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11402
Web score 10705 8813
Video editing score 6884 5956
Data manipulation score 8823 8239
Photo editing score 30928 22485
Writing score 11422 13084
Phones tested 6 models 8 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu1236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu815064
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Ctvy970)AnTuTu922959
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Vinny)AnTuTu746630
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)GeekBench GPU3882
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)GeekBench CPU1000 / 3025
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)AnTuTu884066

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Snapdragon 855

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Adreno 640
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 832 MHz 585 MHz
Pipelines 11 3
Shading units 32 256
Total shaders 352 768
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 898.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 690
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 34.13 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 X24 LTE, X50 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 20
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 5000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 1240 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced October 2019 December 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 SM8150
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
892 (53.7%)
769 (46.3%)
Total votes: 1661

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
saeed July 13, 2022 at 07:18 AM
990 is good for cooking..! just install it on any device and after 10 min working break eggs on it. then you see that rapidly cook the food by bloody temperature...
+60 Reply