Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Kirin 9020

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 (with Adreno 730 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (Maleoon 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • 28% higher CPU clock speed (3200 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9020
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1383793
CPU 537485 484142
GPU 241551 269177
Memory 254727 340806
UX 387045 289668
Total score 1420808 1383793
Samples [116 tests] [10 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 190.8 MB/sec 169.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 126.3 pages/sec 129.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 164.1 Mpixels/sec 126.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 114.8 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 141.5 Mpixels/sec 118.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 37.7 images/sec 43.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 5.21 Mpixels/sec
Samples 72 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.63 images/sec 6.04 images/sec
Face detection 5.22 images/sec 3.28 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 24.4 Gpixels/sec 20.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 666.6 FPS 568.2 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 39 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 856 454
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 6 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2756 -
Stability 44% -
Graphics test 16 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12737 -
Video editing score 7462 -
Data manipulation score 12439 -
Photo editing score 32017 -
Writing score 16257 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 47 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 114 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Euro FighterπŸ¦…)AnTuTu 121676396
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> Strike EagleAnTuTu 121667623
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Abduhakim)AnTuTu 121544080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> Strike EagleAnTuTu 121623425
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Gog)AnTuTu 121527301
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu 111372431
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu 111291607
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu 111328024
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu 111395526
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu 111337422

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 and Kirin 9020

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 10 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 730 Maleoon 920
Architecture Adreno 700 Maleoon
GPU frequency 900 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 512 256
Total shaders 1024 1024
FLOPS 1843.2 Gigaflops 1720.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X65 Balong 6000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 November 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8475 Hi36C0V110
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
58 (49.6%)
59 (50.4%)
Total votes: 117

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9020 and Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Sourav Husain March 22, 2025 at 07:08 PM
Huawei is doing well. But they are still in 2022. Much more improvement is needed.
+3 Reply
Frev September 27, 2025 at 02:24 AM
For a 7nm chip, it's surprisingly good
+1 Reply