Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 (with Adreno 730 graphics) and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (Adreno 740). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Higher GPU frequency (~32%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Supports 31% higher memory bandwidth (67.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1757K vs 1420K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 537485 553922
GPU 241551 434880
Memory 254727 311861
UX 387045 456381
Total score 1420808 1757044
Samples [116 tests] [238 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 190.8 MB/sec 218.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 126.3 pages/sec 145.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 164.1 Mpixels/sec 168.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 114.8 images/sec 133 images/sec
HDR 141.5 Mpixels/sec 167.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16 images/sec 18.8 images/sec
Photo processing 37.7 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 5.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples 72 tests 132 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.63 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Face detection 5.22 images/sec 5.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.56 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 24.4 Gpixels/sec 32.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 666.6 FPS 2177.4 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 39 tests 66 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 856 1092
Stability 98% 67%
Graphics test 6 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 5312
Stability - 67%
Graphics test - 20 FPS
Section 1 - 23 FPS
Section 2 - 20 FPS
Section 3 - 17 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2756 3667
Stability 44% 45%
Graphics test 16 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12737 13957
Video editing score 7462 7265
Data manipulation score 12439 14272
Photo editing score 32017 32179
Writing score 16257 17828
Phones tested 5 models 9 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 89 FPS
[Ultra]
90 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 47 FPS
[Ultra]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends 114 FPS
[Ultra]
118 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
120 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 56 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
1080 x 2400
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
1116 x 2480
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (XfakhR)AnTuTu 111467208
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (spoonky)AnTuTu 121520938
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 (Wortek)AnTuTu 111294979
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 -> OfficalK12Geekbench 6 CPU1429 / 4113
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 -> OfficalK12AnTuTu 111382609
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Horizon377)AnTuTu 121894819
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (DiKevoLi'Phone)AnTuTu 121844320
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Mil)AnTuTu 121763249
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> PhonePornAnTuTu 121873287
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Fluffyicebite:3)AnTuTu 121835927

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 8.5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 730 Adreno 740
Architecture Adreno 700 Adreno 700
GPU frequency 900 MHz 680 MHz
Pipelines 2 3
Shading units 512 512
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 1843.2 Gigaflops 2089 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 67.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X65 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 November 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8475 SM8550-AB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    - There's also the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy," which only differs by having a 160 MHz higher CPU clock and a 39 MHz higher GPU clock, resulting in 2208.8 GFLOPS for the GPU. Generally, you won't notice this difference in real-life usage, including games.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1469 (27.7%)
3835 (72.3%)
Total votes: 5304

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
AizenSosuke. August 6, 2025 at 05:31 AM
Is it a good idea to get the Redmi K60 in 2025? In my country, its price has dropped to 10k
+8 Reply
Avatar
Lulla February 20, 2026 at 10:14 AM
Very gud value for money
0 Reply
Avatar
Userjake May 9, 2023 at 01:09 PM
Is it a wiser decision to get poco f5 pro instead of xiaomi 13?
+85 Reply
Avatar
Jeegsawk May 11, 2023 at 01:14 PM
To me, it is definitely. Just purchased one on day 1 in my country. Xiaomi 13 is much better in: design and camera, but overall to me the POCO grants: better resolution and a perfectly flat display, a plastic body (more robust), 2 days battery span guaranteed, and LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. In conclusion: I would buy 2 Pocos in place of 1 Xiaomi 13. I would prefer Xiaomi 13 if the price difference would be 150€ max.
+67 Reply
Avatar
Steven Seagal April 16, 2023 at 11:56 PM
There isn't much difference between these two. 8Gen2 is like RTX 4090, while 8+Gen1 is RTX 4080.
+303 Reply
Avatar
8 gen2 April 10, 2023 at 10:20 PM
Please complete the average FPS in games for Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor.
+82 Reply
Avatar
Ender February 26, 2023 at 06:07 PM
There is something else than just the benchmark if you look at the consumed power of these processors, gen2 is consume more power than 8+ but gen2 is Stabler than 8+ in 30min.
+83 Reply
Avatar
Nub January 24, 2023 at 08:38 AM
After graphics drivers update for gen1+, the score should be similar.
+113 Reply
Avatar
Heyo January 4, 2023 at 07:59 PM
The 8+ plus is supposedly tsmc, but it certainly looks like Samsung's, lol!
+61 Reply
Avatar
Boris November 19, 2022 at 06:05 PM
Very minimal increase in performance. Just like Apple lately. :)
+32 Reply
Avatar
Mason November 25, 2022 at 05:47 PM
Not really the Motorola x40 leaked a AnTuTu score of 1.312.901 million points it would have around 150k more performance points also single and multi core jumped and has much better features such as ray tracing and WiFi 7
+26 Reply
Avatar
Jake January 8, 2023 at 09:13 PM
Mason, @Mason WiFi 7 isn't going to be available in mainstream devices until 2024, ray tracing is useless, and multicore has jumped a bit but it doesn't justify the $300 price difference most devices are going to be asking for.
+68 Reply
Avatar
Camp January 28, 2023 at 05:07 AM
Jake, But the 300$ price difference is not only for the processor difference. It includes all the improvements like camera, software, memory, etc.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Jake February 12, 2023 at 02:40 AM
Camp, Still not worth it. Minimal difference.
+30 Reply
Avatar
Username April 29, 2023 at 01:26 PM
Jake, Do you have any actual evidence to back up your claims, or are you going to keep moving the goalposts?
+6 Reply
Avatar
DJG August 23, 2023 at 01:27 PM
Mason, Who cares about ray tracing on mobile platforms and WiFi 7, especially if you don't have a WiFi 7-compatible router? These seem like needless "features" at the moment. Until WiFi 7/6e becomes mainstream and is considered standard, buying the latest chip just for bragging rights rather than exceptional functionality seems counterproductive. Just my two cents. The 8+ Gen 1 takes the lead here.
+38 Reply
Avatar
Berg February 14, 2025 at 03:27 PM
Mason, Xiaomi 12t pro uses 8+ gen 1 yet, has 200k more points
+3 Reply