Dimensity 8200 vs Dimensity 8050

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (with Mali-G610 MP6 graphics) and Dimensity 8050 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8200
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Performs 43% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1240K vs 1029K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1240821
1029484
CPU 428145 378209
GPU 233006 135451
Memory 267125 206995
UX 312545 308829
Total score 1240821 1029484
Samples [73 tests] [21 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 172.8 MB/sec 163.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 108 pages/sec 96.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 140.4 Mpixels/sec 128.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 86.2 images/sec 69.7 images/sec
HDR 118.4 Mpixels/sec 117.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 9.86 images/sec
Photo processing 34.4 images/sec 33.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.63 Mpixels/sec 4.59 Mpixels/sec
Samples 28 tests 15 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 6.16 images/sec 7.18 images/sec
Face detection 2.93 images/sec 3.68 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.3 Gpixels/sec 14.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.6 FPS 764.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 15 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 626 445
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 5 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1788 1300
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 10 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14549
Web score 11474 11867
Video editing score 5571 6512
Data manipulation score 10859 9539
Photo editing score 32165 41710
Writing score 20448 21233
Phones tested 11 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Jagannath Bhadra)AnTuTu 121274406
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> chmakAnTuTu 121394231
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Kubyshko)AnTuTu 111130854
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_Geekbench 6 GPU4860
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_Geekbench 6 CPU1354 / 4129
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Saint)AnTuTu 111041022
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-01 (Javohir)AnTuTu 111038280
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-21 (xmalle)AnTuTu 111033346
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-19 (Ivan)AnTuTu 11937684
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-08 (ParimKnight)AnTuTu 11999486

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8200 and Dimensity 8050

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3100 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP6 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 950 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 6 9
Shading units 64 32
Total shaders 384 288
FLOPS 729.6 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580 MediaTek APU 570

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2022 May 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6896Z MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8050 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
490 (73.2%)
179 (26.8%)
Total votes: 669

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8050 and Dimensity 8200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!