Snapdragon 888 vs Dimensity 8050
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (with Adreno 660 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8050 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
- Performs 66% better in floating-point computations
- Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
- Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
- Shows better (up to 20%) AnTuTu 10 score – 873K vs 726K
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050
- Announced 2-years and 6-months later
- 6% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2840 MHz)
- Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
Promotion
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 10
| CPU | 226598 | 205943 |
| GPU | 267817 | 184957 |
| Memory | 168662 | 146755 |
| UX | 208948 | 183418 |
| Total score | 873545 | 726027 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Compute Score (GPU)
Promotion
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 91% | 96% |
| Graphics test | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Score | 5037 | 4531 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | 83 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Fortnite | 26 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Shadowgun Legends | 89 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 112 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Genshin Impact | 58 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Device | Asus Zenfone 8 1080 x 2400 |
- |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Dimensity 8050CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2840 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 10.3 billion | - |
| TDP | 8 W | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MP9 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 792 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 9 |
| Shading units | 512 | 64 |
| Total shaders | 1024 | 576 |
| FLOPS | 1622 Gigaflops | 979.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 780 | MediaTek APU 570 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 200MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X60 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 22 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2020 | May 2023 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | SM8350 | MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 461