Dimensity 8050 vs Dimensity 6080

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8050 (with Mali-G77 MP9 graphics) and Dimensity 6080 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050
  • Performs 3.7x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17.07 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 80%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1029K vs 573K
  • 25% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2400 MHz)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  • Higher GPU frequency (~21%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1029484
CPU 378209 218246
GPU 135451 46534
Memory 206995 126743
UX 308829 181937
Total score 1029484 573460
Samples [21 tests] [24 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 163.8 MB/sec 100.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 96.3 pages/sec 53.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 128.8 Mpixels/sec 70.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 69.7 images/sec 40 images/sec
HDR 117.2 Mpixels/sec 62.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.86 images/sec 6.38 images/sec
Photo processing 33.4 images/sec 16.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.59 Mpixels/sec 2.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples 15 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4802
Background blur 7.18 images/sec 2.07 images/sec
Face detection 3.68 images/sec 1.04 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 14.3 Gpixels/sec 4.04 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 764.6 FPS 242.8 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 12 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 445 150
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1300 -
Graphics test 7 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14549
Web score 11867 11053
Video editing score 6512 5306
Data manipulation score 9539 8410
Photo editing score 41710 20240
Writing score 21233 13119
Phones tested 4 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Saint)AnTuTu 111041022
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-01 (Javohir)AnTuTu 111038280
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-21 (xmalle)AnTuTu 111033346
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-19 (Ivan)AnTuTu 11937684
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-08 (ParimKnight)AnTuTu 11999486
MediaTek Dimensity 6080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> EXRAnTuTu 11611221
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Dadaba)AnTuTu 11587520
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (nxtzss)AnTuTu 11586686
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-06 (dm1q)AnTuTu 11605816
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-03 (Sasasas)AnTuTu 11564755

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8050 and Dimensity 6080

CPU

Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3000 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP9 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 886 MHz 1068 MHz
Pipelines 9 2
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 288 64
FLOPS 510.3 Gigaflops 136.7 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 570 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2023 June 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA MT6833, MT6833GP
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8050 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6080 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
503 (89.8%)
57 (10.2%)
Total votes: 560

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6080 and Dimensity 8050, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
PROFESSIONAL GAMERS March 12, 2024 at 11:48 PM
The TP6PRO5G is now released with an MTKD 6080 chip, boasting a 12+12 configuration. However, it often experiences frame drops in Genshin, even at a budget price. I would recommend choosing the TC20P5G or the INFINIX GT 10 PRO instead, as they both offer budget gaming options with a superior 8050 chip.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Shiina K. January 17, 2024 at 07:41 AM
This is literally an unfair comparison for the 6080, LOL!
+3 Reply
Avatar
Topi Sibug February 27, 2024 at 04:08 AM
The review is legitimate. On Genshin, Dimensity 8050 can handle the highest 60 fps, while Dimensity 6080 can only handle medium 60 fps.
+21 Reply