Xring O1 vs Kirin 9025
We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16) with the newer 8-core HiSilicon Kirin 9025 (Maleoon 920) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
- Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 7 nm)
- Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 11 score β 2963K vs 1325K
- 50% higher CPU clock speed (3900 vs 2600 MHz)
- Has 2 more cores
- Better instruction set architecture
- Supports 13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 68.2 GB/s)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 937172 | 370183 |
| GPU | 996086 | 295489 |
| Memory | 409648 | 434593 |
| UX | 620146 | 225467 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 1325732 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | Less than 3 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 332.8 MB/sec | - |
| HTML 5 Browser | 236.9 pages/sec | - |
| PDF Renderer | 266 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Image detection | 208.8 images/sec | - |
| HDR | 262.9 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Background blur | 32.7 images/sec | - |
| Photo processing | 80.1 images/sec | - |
| Ray tracing | 8.25 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Samples | 4 tests | - |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 42.3 images/sec | - |
| Face detection | 14.3 images/sec | - |
| Horizon detection | 0.9 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Edge detection | 1.15 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Gaussian blur | 1.72 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Feature matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Stereo matching | 71.6 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Particle physics | 2977 FPS | - |
| API | Vulkan | - |
| Samples | 4 tests | - |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 2413 | - |
| Stability | 92% | - |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 9022 | - |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 31 FPS | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 5832 | - |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | - |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17566 | - |
| Video editing score | 6957 | - |
| Data manipulation score | 15048 | - |
| Photo editing score | 27481 | - |
| Writing score | 19142 | - |
| Phones tested | 3 models | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Xring O1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2842416 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Albert) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21512 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2746 / 8431 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | AnTuTu 11 | 2963052 |
HiSilicon Kirin 9025
No benchmark results yet
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and Kirin 9025CPU
| Architecture | 2x 3.9 GHz β Cortex-X925 4x 3.4 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.9 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.8 GHz β Cortex-A520 |
1x 2.6 GHz β TaiShan V121 3x 2.15 GHz β TaiShan V120 4x 1.6 GHz β Taishan-Little |
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3900 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 10 MB |
| Process | 3 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 19 billion | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Valhall 5th gen | Maleoon |
| GPU frequency | 1392 MHz | - |
| Pipelines | 16 | 4 |
| Shading units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shaders | 2048 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
| NPU theoretical performance | 44 TOPS | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5T | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max display resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | Balong 6000 |
| 4G support | - | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7900 Mbps | Up to 7500 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 4200 Mbps | Up to 3500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2025 | October 2026 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | - | Hi36C0V110 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1