MediaTek Dimensity 6080 β an 8-core chipset that was announced on June 8, 2023, and is manufactured using a 6-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Cortex-A76 at 2400 MHz and 6 cores Cortex-A55 at 2000 MHz.
Review
CPU Performance
26
Gaming Performance
6
Battery life
87
NanoReview Score
31
Compare MediaTek Dimensity 6080 with other SoCs
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 11
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
It seems like there is a typo in the flops calculation, because G99 with same gpu and lower frequency got 281Gflops and D6080 with higher frequency only have 136Gflops, the dimensity 6080 should have a higher flops calculation.
+34Reply
KokoroDecember 16, 2024 at 09:48 AM
Dimensity 6080 has 1068MHz GPU Frequency not 950MHz.
Why are they still making chips with a 6 nanometer process? -_-
+590Reply
ParvazFebruary 28, 2024 at 09:48 AM
Bro, 6nm is excellent for the budget price. If they were to use the 4nm process currently, the prices in this segment would increase by 100%.
+80Reply
BhutapaMarch 28, 2024 at 02:51 PM
Parvaz, Dude, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 fits into the budget segment and is processed on the 4nm node.
+67Reply
DeltaApril 25, 2024 at 12:04 AM
Bhutapa, The thing is though that 4 gen 2 has a 4nm fabrication it's made by Samsung which is inferior to tsmc' 6nm fabrication in the dimensity 6080, for example, the 4 gen 2 already has a weaker gpu than the 6080 which isn't even that hardcore and yet it still thermal throttles severely when using 5g as it heats u a lot when gaming thus falling even further behind the 6080 in the process
Tldr it's not always equal smaller fabrication equals better it's important to take into account the quality of it.
+17Reply
BhutapaApril 28, 2024 at 01:23 AM
Delta, Thank you for your in-depth analysis comparing the TSMC and Samsung production processes. I am already familiar with this information.
However, the focus of my point was about the budget, not the quality.
In the lower-budget market segment, consumers seldom prioritize gamingβ at least in my geographic region. They typically want a functional phone for daily use.
For consumers interested in gaming, there are superior options to the Dimensity 6080 within a similar budget and in the slightly lower mid-range bracket. For example, the Dimensity 7200 is a more suitable choice in my region, given the budget constraints. Phones such as the Vivo T3 and IQOO Z9 (of course, they are from the same parent company BBK and have similar phone specs) have breached this price barrier.
To summarize: an argument need not be made where there isn't one.
+15Reply
BhutapaApril 28, 2024 at 01:26 AM
Delta, PS - The Sanpdragon 4 gen 2 was merely an example for a case-proof for existence of budget 4nm chips
+3Reply
DeltaMay 15, 2024 at 10:07 AM
Bhutapa, I see. Thank you for sharing this. I didn't account for that originally.
+2Reply
Naming scamOctober 3, 2024 at 11:53 PM
Bhutapa, It is wrong to say that 4nm Samsung is the same as 4nm TSMC or 4nm Intel. It is just a name and has nothing to do with size.
It is the case-proof for the existence of gullible people who fall for this naming scam.
Bhutapa, Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is made using Samsung 4LPX process which is a rebranded Samsung 5nm process, its 5nm not 4nm.
0Reply
TheoSeptember 22, 2023 at 11:44 AM
How many rebrandeds chips you have?
Mediatek: Yes
+390Reply
Specimen 1April 27, 2024 at 04:20 PM
I mean, Snapdragon did the same thing with the 7s Gen 2. And don't even get me started on the 685, which uses the ancient Cortex A73.
+9Reply
MessiiApril 28, 2024 at 01:41 AM
Specimen 1, The Snapdragon chip naming scheme is just as messed up too. The average consumer barely grasps the differences between generations 7, 7s, 7+, 8, 8+ and now generation 6 adds to the ensuing confusion.
+46Reply
Specimen 1May 15, 2024 at 10:17 AM
Messii, Yes, both MediaTek and Qualcomm used to have a more coherent naming scheme, but now they are both trying to make their SOCs sound better than they are. MediaTek's naming scheme is extremely weird as the "6080" in my phone (Tecno Pova 5 Pro) is able to keep up with my cousin's phone, which has a Dimensity 7050, thus making it better than the 6100+, 7020, 7025. Though it seems MediaTek has realized this and just rebranded and released it as the Dimensity "6300".
+8Reply
MessiiMay 18, 2024 at 02:28 PM
Specimen 1, I agree. Phone manufacturers misuse this naming convention by proclaiming "Phone with the first Dimensity 7025" and other similar marketing gimmicks. Lord help the average consumer. Again, many thanks for the information available on this site which helps us make informed purchases.
+6Reply
MessiiJune 25, 2024 at 05:10 PM
Messii, I agree. Phone manufacturers misuse this naming convention by proclaiming "Phone with the first Dimensity 7025" and other similar marketing gimmicks. Lord help the average consumer. Again, many thanks for the information available on this site which helps us make informed purchases.
+11Reply
Specimen 1October 5, 2024 at 07:54 PM
Messii, Indeed, if I was not aware of these sites I would have likely gotten a a32 and probably regreted it.
