Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

We compared two 12-core laptop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 370 and (X1E-84-100)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Newer - released 7 months later
  • More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 5.9 vs 4.6 TFLOPS
  • 21% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 475
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5200
Cinebench Scores (106th and 102nd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1150 MB/sec 1340 MB/sec
Clang compilation 144.9 Klines/sec 139.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 338.7 pages/sec 335.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 416.5 Mpixels/sec 468.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 268.6 pages/sec 322.1 pages/sec
Background blur 67.7 images/sec 63.8 images/sec
Photo processing 117.6 images/sec 124.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 25 Mpixels/sec 33.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 10 & 3 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 71.9 GOps/sec 122.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 106.9 GOps/sec 76.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 301M Primes/sec 127M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 34M Strings/sec 48.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 16.2 GBytes/sec 22.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 219.6 MBytes/sec 442.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 1748 Frames/sec 1881 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 16.4B Matrices/sec 31.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 21 & 3074 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 34.9 PPW 23 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 434.6 PPW 295.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 708.8 PPW 647.4 PPW
Blender / Watt - 5.21 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Eggburt)Cinebench 2024127 / 794
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Nvdya)Cinebench 2024114 / 1135
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Peterr)Cinebench 2024117 / 962
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)GeekBench2904 / 15532
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Asus Tuf FA608WI)Cinebench 2024104 / 1050
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-15 (Urxelix)Cinebench 2024116 / 1217

Specifications

Full technical specification of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

General

Vendor Qualcomm Amd
Released October 24, 2023 June 3, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set ARMv9 x86-64
Codename Snapdragon X Zen 5 (Strix Point)
Model number X1E-84-100 370
Integrated GPU Qualcomm Adreno X1 Radeon 890M
Rival Equivalent - Apple M3 Pro - Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Successor - - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#31st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 12 4
P-Threads 12 8
Base Frequency (P) 3.8 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.2 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores - 8
E-Threads - 16
Base Frequency (E) - 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 12 12
Total Threads 12 24
Bus Frequency - 100 MHz
Multiplier 38x 20x
L1 Cache - 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 12MB (shared) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache - 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 35 W 15-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W -
Socket Custom FP8
Peak Temperature - 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (53rd and 43rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Qualcomm Adreno X1 AMD Radeon 890M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1500 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1024
TMUs 96 64
ROPs 48 32
Execution Units 6 16
TGP 30 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5x-8448 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 64 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 8 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 135 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
48 (10.6%)
403 (89.4%)
Total votes: 451

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Darko March 3, 2025 at 07:26 AM
Crazy comments.. This comparison shows Elite is obviously better. Comparable processing power yet DOUBLE the efficiency
0 Reply
Avatar
Moinak June 16, 2024 at 07:54 PM
AMD looks to be stealing the show. However, the real experience may still depend on the workload because of the dual-channel memory limitation on AMD. Data-heavy workloads benefit from the 8-channel memory on SDXE. Related example: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16482/lenovo-thinkstation-p620-review-a-vehicle-for-threadripper-pro/5
+13 Reply
Avatar
HOW June 14, 2024 at 01:09 PM
Heard that MediaTek is working with Nvidia to produce an ARM Windows chip as well. More and more companies are joining the AI PC market.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Six June 5, 2024 at 06:03 PM
The Snapdragon X Elite is too late. AMD wins this time and Intel... Intel is lost and doesn't know what to do. Maybe Intel Lunar Lake has a chance.
+26 Reply
Avatar
dRm July 15, 2024 at 08:00 PM
100%.While I love the bold attempt of SDXE, at this point in time it's good but not mind-blowing. If it would have come out a year or two earlier, it would have been the bomb. The move to ARM will inevitably come with some difficulties initially, and if you want a high level of early adoption, you must give something in return - either mind-blowing performance or mind-blowing efficiency or both. Like the M1 was gor Mac. Unfortunately it seems like competitors have caught up already and will be able to give you comparable performance without the quirks.
+5 Reply