Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs Adreno X2-90

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) with 96 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 5 years and 2 months newer Adreno X2-90 that utilizes 12 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X2-90 over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-90
  • Performs significantly better (up to 5.8x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • 3.2x higher maximum theoretical performance (7.6 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Has 2.7x more shading units (2048 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
11
-
-
-
The Witcher 3
12
11
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
19
12
9
-
-
Far Cry 6
14
11
-
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
14
12
10
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
11
-
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
13
9
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 -
1080p Ultra 10 -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1282 3782
Solar Bay - 24300
Port Royal - 1592
Fire Strike 4411 10039
Wild Life Extreme 3119 9890
Night Raid 14097 57486
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 34.5 img/sec -
Face Detection 27.4 img/sec -
Horizon Detection 0.75 Gpixels/sec -
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian Blur 0.39 Gpixels/sec -
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo Matching 55.6 Gpixels/sec -
Particle Physics 3061.7 FPS -
API OpenCL -
Sources: Geekbench [3]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 592
DirectX 11 - 57 FPS
DirectX 12 - 29 FPS
GPU Compute - 3638 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 61 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810
Adreno X2-90
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1428 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 2420 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1551 -
Face Detection (HP) 3685 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 6255 -
Text Classification (SP) 938 -
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 -
Object Detection (SP) 1581 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 4305 -
Style Transfer (SP) 26119 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and Adreno X2-90

General

Vendor Intel Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released August 15, 2020 September 25, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.1 Adreno X2
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Adreno X2
Rival Equivalent - - Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100) or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-90-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-88-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-94-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (123rd and 34th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 950-1550 MHz (configurable) 1700-1850 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 128
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 64
Compute Units (Pipelines) 96 12
Tensor Cores - No
L2 Cache 1024KB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 GPixel/s 109-118 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTexel/s 218-237 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Adreno X2-90 +217%
7-7.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus IGP
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 10 nm 3 nm
Die Size 146 mm² 220 mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent -
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent -
Bus - 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.2 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!