AMD Radeon 860M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 860M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 4 years and 6 months older Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) that utilizes 96 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) over Radeon 860M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 860M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.5x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
  • Shows 2x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 14 vs 7 FPS
  • 29% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.1 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 32% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (22K vs 17K)
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
  • Has 50% more shading units (768 vs 512)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
24
20
11
21
11
-
-
The Witcher 3
19
18
11
-
12
11
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
39
26
19
9
19
12
9
-
Far Cry 6
31
26
16
9
14
11
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
16
12
10
-
9
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
27
17
12
14
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
16
12
9
-
11
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
29
22
15
-
15
13
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 26 14
1080p Ultra 20 10
1440p Ultra 14 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2604 1282
Solar Bay 11094 -
Port Royal 1046 -
Fire Strike 6772 4411
Wild Life Extreme 5124 3119
Night Raid 29064 14097
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 57.2 img/sec 34.5 img/sec
Face Detection 30.5 img/sec 27.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.83 Gpixels/sec 0.75 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.16 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.93 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 97.8 Gpixels/sec 55.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3933.5 FPS 3061.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 920 -
DirectX 11 37 FPS -
DirectX 12 25 FPS -
GPU Compute 2437 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 2351 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 33 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 860M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Geekbench 6 OpenCL24017
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Steel Nomad Light2476
📘 2026-07-04 -> Starjack36Geekbench 6 OpenCL24971
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 OpenCL16849
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 2022 1428
Image Segmentation (HP) 3987 2420
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6657 1551
Face Detection (HP) 10337 3685
Pose Estimation (Q) 28437 6255
Text Classification (SP) 2326 938
Machine Translation (HP) 4011 1028
Object Detection (SP) 1995 1581
Depth Estimation (Q) 12031 4305
Style Transfer (SP) 56710 26119
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 860M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Krackan Point Tiger Lake GT2
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 140T -
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 or above - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
- Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
Laptop GPU ranking (101st and 125th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 600 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 3000 MHz 950-1550 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 512 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 24
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 96
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores 8 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 GPixel/s 23-37 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 96 GTexel/s 46-74 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 4 nm 10 nm
Die Size 233 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 34 billion -
Transistor Density 145.92 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.1
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
8 (88.9%)
1 (11.1%)
Total votes: 9

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!