Google Tensor vs A16 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20) with the newer 6-core Apple A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~64%)
  • Performs 65% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 61%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1626K vs 1010K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • 24% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1010025
A16 Bionic +61%
1626008
CPU 365546 432740
GPU 169803 490354
Memory 178763 216774
UX 295913 486140
Total score 1010025 1626008
Samples [51 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A16 Bionic +78%
2631
Multi-Core Score
A16 Bionic +84%
6602
Asset compression 159.8 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 97.5 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 83.4 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.1 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 30.2 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.44 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A16 Bionic +156%
22851
Background blur 13.2 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 7.31 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.5 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.55 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 39.4 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1368.9 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 11 tests 12 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 704 -
Stability 63% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 16 FPS
Section 1 - 20 FPS
Section 2 - 16 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A16 Bionic +76%
3335
Score 1899 3335
Stability 59% 71%
Graphics test 11 FPS 19 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7105 -
Video editing score 5884 -
Data manipulation score 10310 -
Photo editing score 19072 -
Writing score 15550 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-29 (rulz_103)AnTuTu 121225085
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> Islom_1180AnTuTu 121235821
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vladiโ™‚๏ธSlaveโ™‚๏ธ)AnTuTu 121281085
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu 11774697
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu 11930801
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (ะั‚ะพะผะฝะฐั ะฑะพะผะฑะฐ)AnTuTu 111772840
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-31 (LORDroid)AnTuTu 111445126

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Google Tensor and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex A55
2x 3.46 GHz โ€“ Everest
4x 2.02 GHz โ€“ Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2800 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5.6 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP20 Apple A16 GPU
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 20 5
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 640 640
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Tensor Processing Unit Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300b -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS101 (S5P9845) APL1W10
Official page Google Tensor official site -
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
62 (50%)
62 (50%)
Total votes: 124

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Google Tensor, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!