Google Tensor vs A17 Pro

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20) with the newer 6-core Apple A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~64%)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 45%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1467K vs 1010K
  • 35% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1010025
A17 Pro +45%
1467470
CPU 365546 374357
GPU 169803 463612
Memory 178763 184670
UX 295913 444831
Total score 1010025 1467470
Samples [51 tests] [21 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A17 Pro +101%
2969
Multi-Core Score
A17 Pro +111%
7599
Asset compression 159.8 MB/sec 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 97.5 pages/sec 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 83.4 images/sec 178.7 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.1 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 30.2 images/sec 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.44 Mpixels/sec 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A17 Pro +215%
28057
Background blur 13.2 images/sec 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 7.31 images/sec 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.5 Gpixels/sec 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.55 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 39.4 Gpixels/sec 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1368.9 FPS 3313.9 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 11 tests 22 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
A17 Pro +98%
1391
Score 704 1391
Stability 63% 71%
Graphics test 5 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 6089
Stability - 73%
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Section 1 - 29 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A17 Pro +92%
3655
Score 1899 3655
Stability 59% 63%
Graphics test 11 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7105 -
Video editing score 5884 -
Data manipulation score 10310 -
Photo editing score 19072 -
Writing score 15550 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (rulz_103)AnTuTu 121225085
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> Islom_1180AnTuTu 121235821
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vladi♂️Slave♂️)AnTuTu 121281085
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu 11774697
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu 11930801
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111996792
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Google Tensor and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2800 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count - 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5.6 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP20 Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 20 6
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 640 768
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Tensor Processing Unit Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300b Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS101 (S5P9845) APL1V02
Official page Google Tensor official site -
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
25 (47.2%)
28 (52.8%)
Total votes: 53

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and Google Tensor, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!