Dimensity 8100 vs Dimensity 8000

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (with Mali-G610 MP6 graphics) and Dimensity 8000 (). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  • Higher GPU frequency (~23%)
  • Performs 23% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1092605
1080933
CPU 408979 377652
GPU 172618 157488
Memory 201895 208961
UX 309113 336832
Total score 1092605 1080933
Samples [52 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 181.3 MB/sec 141.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 108.3 pages/sec 91.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 134.5 Mpixels/sec 114.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 88.6 images/sec 79.2 images/sec
HDR 131.3 Mpixels/sec 93 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.3 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 32.3 images/sec 32.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.87 Mpixels/sec 3.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.92 images/sec 4.75 images/sec
Face detection 2.66 images/sec 3.5 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.79 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 849.5 FPS 1124.7 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 12 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 564 -
Stability 92% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1540 1296
Stability 91% 91%
Graphics test 9 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 11581 -
Video editing score 7037 -
Data manipulation score 8309 -
Photo editing score 19759 -
Writing score 16904 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[High]
-
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 98 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838
MediaTek Dimensity 8000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-09 (Aryu14)Geekbench 6 GPU5832
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-09 (Aryu14)Geekbench 6 CPU1097 / 3309

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8100 and Dimensity 8000

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2850 MHz 2750 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP6 -
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen -
GPU frequency 860 MHz 700 MHz
Pipelines 6 -
Shading units 64 -
Total shaders 384 -
FLOPS 660.5 Gigaflops 537.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580 MediaTek APU 580

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 MediaTek UltraSave 2.0
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 March 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6895Z/TCZA MT6895
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8000 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
374 (67.9%)
177 (32.1%)
Total votes: 551

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8000 and Dimensity 8100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Guest 2 June 22, 2024 at 08:54 AM
This comparison highlights whats wrong on Nanoreview. 8100 is better in everyway, is praised by Geekerwan yet for some stupid reason, the 8000 scores higher than it.
+2 Reply
Avatar
guest May 31, 2022 at 06:10 PM
Make 0 sense for 8100 to have a lower score, when it's identical to 8000 and clocked higher!
+19 Reply