Dimensity 8100 vs Dimensity 7200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (with Mali-G610 MP6 graphics) and Dimensity 7200 (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1092K vs 971K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~31%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1092605
CPU 408979 362430
GPU 172618 148984
Memory 201895 169068
UX 309113 290942
Total score 1092605 971424
Samples [52 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 181.3 MB/sec 127.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 108.3 pages/sec 73.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 134.5 Mpixels/sec 86.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 88.6 images/sec 42.2 images/sec
HDR 131.3 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.3 images/sec 8.69 images/sec
Photo processing 32.3 images/sec 21.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.87 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.92 images/sec 5.06 images/sec
Face detection 2.66 images/sec 2.89 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.79 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 849.5 FPS 909.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 12 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 564 447
Stability 92% -
Graphics test 4 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1540 1158
Stability 91% 99%
Graphics test 9 FPS 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 11581 -
Video editing score 7037 -
Data manipulation score 8309 -
Photo editing score 19759 -
Writing score 16904 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[High]
-
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 98 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Kaiser)AnTuTu 121001163
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vedurijuht2425)AnTuTu 121045921
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu 11980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu 11964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu 111003769

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8100 and Dimensity 7200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2850 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP6 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 860 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 6 4
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 384 256
FLOPS 660.5 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 -
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 February 2023
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6895Z/TCZA MT6886
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 - MediaTek Dimensity 7400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
955 (81.6%)
215 (18.4%)
Total votes: 1170

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 and Dimensity 8100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!