Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Dimensity 8100

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (with Adreno 725 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8100
  • Performs 80% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1317K vs 1092K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  • Higher GPU frequency (~48%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 532680 408979
GPU 166554 172618
Memory 232990 201895
UX 384783 309113
Total score 1317007 1092605
Samples [52 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 182 MB/sec 181.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 116.1 pages/sec 108.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 137.9 Mpixels/sec 134.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 112.4 images/sec 88.6 images/sec
HDR 137.2 Mpixels/sec 131.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16.1 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 40.5 images/sec 32.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.62 Mpixels/sec 4.87 Mpixels/sec
Samples 51 tests 19 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 7.38 images/sec 4.92 images/sec
Face detection 3.36 images/sec 2.66 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.3 Gpixels/sec 9.79 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 772.3 FPS 849.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 614 564
Stability 98% 92%
Graphics test 5 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1956 1540
Stability 85% 91%
Graphics test 11 FPS 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
Web score - 11581
Video editing score - 7037
Data manipulation score - 8309
Photo editing score - 19759
Writing score - 16904
Phones tested - 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]
77 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 38 FPS
[Ultra]
26 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 81 FPS
[Ultra]
74 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 116 FPS
[Ultra]
98 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 114 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco F5
1080 x 2400
OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Bers2409)AnTuTu 121442782
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Q)AnTuTu 121277293
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Rehan shaikh)AnTuTu 111318003
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (MobileEngineer Harway)AnTuTu 111304220
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (Koreia27)AnTuTu 111450376
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 and Dimensity 8100

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2910 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 1024 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 10.2 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 725 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture Adreno 700 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 580 MHz 860 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 512 64
Total shaders 1024 384
FLOPS 1187.8 Gigaflops 660.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 580

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X62 MediaTek UltraSave 2.0
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4400 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2023 March 2022
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SM7475-AB MT6895Z/TCZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2458 (73.1%)
904 (26.9%)
Total votes: 3362

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8100 and Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ved August 6, 2023 at 12:40 PM
The Snapdragon 8th Gen-1 might sound superior when compared to the Snapdragon 7th Gen-2, but the reality is quite different. The Snapdragon 7th Gen-2 is the best processor after the Snapdragon 8th Gen 2. There's no real competitor to the Poco F5 within the 30K range. While there have been motherboard issues with the X series, the F series seems to be all good. Its performance is excellent, it has a good rear camera and an average selfie camera - perfect for multitasking, which is exactly what a hardcore gamer needs.
+58 Reply
Avatar
Shaikh Muzammil February 5, 2024 at 10:46 AM
My Poco F5 is currently at the service center due to a motherboard technical issue. Eight days have passed, but my phone is not yet repaired. Poco is not a good mobile company, in my opinion.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Your Tech Guy June 20, 2023 at 07:02 PM
Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in other simplest explanation is just the Lite version of Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. They both have the same architecture, the SD 8+ Gen 1 is just overclocked.
+86 Reply
Avatar
Tech Reviews March 31, 2023 at 02:17 PM
Qualcomm Snapdragon is taking the competition very seriously with its new mid-range chipset of 2023, the 7+ Gen 2, and it's quite impressive. While it may not be the most power-efficient compared to the undisputed king of power efficiency, MediaTek Dimensity 8100, it's one of the most consistent mid-range chipsets for intense graphical games. The 7+ Gen 2 can run Genshin Impact consistently at 56 FPS for the first 11 minutes, but it slightly drops to 52 FPS. This is better compared to the previous 7 Gen 1, which runs at 54 FPS for the first 12 minutes but drops to 25 FPS. Quite impressive, Snapdragon! In benchmarks, the 7+ Gen 2 may not be as close to the 8+ Gen 1 in CPU and GPU performance, but it is much better and more efficient than the Dimensity 8200.
+163 Reply
Avatar
Ok April 28, 2023 at 11:40 PM
8+ Gen 1 is just an overclocked version of 7+ Gen 2, so the stability of it is kinda trash compared to 7+ Gen 2, both of their architecture are the same. Therefore, my conclusion is, it's close when you overclocked 7+ Gen 2 which will have the same output as 8+ Gen 1. πŸ€ͺ
+150 Reply