Dimensity 8400 vs A10 Fusion

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7) with the older 4-core Apple A10 Fusion (PowerVR GT7600) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 9.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 358% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 16 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.8x) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1948K vs 516K
  • Has 4 more cores
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2x)
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the A10 Fusion
  • 39% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2340 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
516981
CPU 623766 202669
GPU 596540 63274
Memory 331200 84317
UX 396922 166721
Total score 1948428 516981
Samples [313 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1576
Multi-Core Score
6239
1484
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 57.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 38.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 44.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 14.2 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 56.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 4.38 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 13.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 1.7 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
4352
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 11 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 9.32 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.4 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 10.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 415.5 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 31 tests 2 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 -
Stability 86% -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 20 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 693
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 -
Video editing score 6661 -
Data manipulation score 13175 -
Photo editing score 23584 -
Writing score 17637 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Mohammad Mamun)AnTuTu 122125725
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Muhamad Rosyid (indonesia))AnTuTu 122280224
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 -> Timur55AnTuTu 111910022
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-02 (LEADER OF DAWN)Geekbench 7 CPU1165 / 3044
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
Apple A10 Fusion
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 (TeknoPiri)AnTuTu 11497446
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-15 (hellz1)Geekbench 6 GPU4352
๐Ÿ“˜ 2024-02-21 (Cap1bara_tech)Geekbench 6 CPU882 / 1484

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and A10 Fusion

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
2x 2.34 GHz โ€“ Hurricane
2x 1.05 GHz โ€“ Zephyr
Cores 8 4
Frequency 3250 MHz 2340 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 64 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 16 nanometers
Transistor count - 3.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 PowerVR GT7600
Architecture 5th gen PowerVR Series7XT (Rogue)
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 650 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 896 192
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 249.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 3.0 1.2
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 No

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 1333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2048 x 1536
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VC-1
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Qualcomm MDM9645M
4G support - LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 100 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 6.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2024 September 2016
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z APL1W24
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 4

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A10 Fusion and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!