Dimensity 8400 vs Apple A18

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A18 (Apple A18 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 22% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)
Pros of Apple A18
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 25% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3250 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~15%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
Apple A18 +1%
1972476
CPU 623766 611649
GPU 596540 589953
Memory 331200 181123
UX 396922 589751
Total score 1948428 1972476
Samples [313 tests] [29 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Apple A18 +118%
3431
Multi-Core Score
Apple A18 +38%
8638
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 286.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 184.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 201.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 297.2 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 279.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 36.2 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 90 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 8.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Apple A18 +130%
28010
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 1.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 1.44 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 77.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 2811.1 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 31 tests 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple A18 +17%
1579
Score 1346 1579
Stability 86% 75%
Graphics test 10 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Apple A18 +13%
6750
Score 5948 6750
Graphics test 23 FPS 26 FPS
Section 1 25 FPS 31 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 26 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 20 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 -
Video editing score 6661 -
Data manipulation score 13175 -
Photo editing score 23584 -
Writing score 17637 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Apple A18

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3250 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 6 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Apple A18 GPU
Architecture 5th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines 7 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 640
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 1907 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 September 2024
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z APL1V08
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
177 (74.1%)
62 (25.9%)
Total votes: 239

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Apple A18 and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Moni Chandra Rai January 25, 2025 at 04:15 AM
It clearly shown that Dimensity 8400 better choice than A18 bionic,, in term of cost. Performance is also equivalent to each other compared to price distances ..
+34 Reply