Dimensity 8400 vs Dimensity 8200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and Dimensity 8200 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 3.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 57%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 1240K
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~37%)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 3100 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
1240821
CPU 623766 428145
GPU 596540 233006
Memory 331200 267125
UX 396922 312545
Total score 1948428 1240821
Samples [313 tests] [73 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 172.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 108 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 140.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 86.2 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 118.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 34.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 4.63 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 28 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 955.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 31 tests 15 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 626
Stability 86% 97%
Graphics test 10 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 20 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1788
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14015
Web score 14034 11474
Video editing score 6661 5571
Data manipulation score 13175 10859
Photo editing score 23584 32165
Writing score 17637 20448
Phones tested 5 models 11 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> Regenis0AnTuTu 121470608
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Jagannath Bhadra)AnTuTu 121274406
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> chmakAnTuTu 121394231
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Kubyshko)AnTuTu 111130854
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_Geekbench 6 GPU4860

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 8200

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture 5th gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 896 384
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 729.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek APU 580

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 December 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z MT6896Z
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
80 (87.9%)
11 (12.1%)
Total votes: 91

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8200 and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!