Dimensity 9000 vs Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (with Mali-G710 MP10 graphics) and Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8300
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~65%)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 3050 MHz)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 1504K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1504467
1604305
CPU 546692 482670
GPU 290175 432750
Memory 237462 299238
UX 430138 389647
Total score 1504467 1604305
Samples [14 tests] [103 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 170.6 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 120.5 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.2 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 115.4 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 140.3 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.7 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 38.9 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 12 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.55 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 4.42 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.3 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1296 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 775 881
Stability 63% 77%
Graphics test 6 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3688
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2332 2768
Stability 71% -
Graphics test 13 FPS 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14649
Video editing score - 6419
Data manipulation score - 12555
Photo editing score - 23328
Writing score - 18403
Phones tested - 2 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu1500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu1500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu1584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu1542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu1561642
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (67)GeekBench GPU5243
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (67)GeekBench CPU1403 / 4649
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (Zix)AnTuTu1623585
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (67-2)AnTuTu1833656
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (JOSUK3)AnTuTu1598851

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9000 and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3050 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP10 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 848 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 10 6
Shading units 64 128
Total shaders 640 768
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 590 MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3750 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 60 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3200 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7000 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2021 November 2023
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6983 MT6897
Official page - MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
183 (20.7%)
703 (79.3%)
Total votes: 886

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Dimensity 9000, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Emperor December 19, 2025 at 10:39 AM
Except for PC emulation Dimensity 8300 is better than 9000.
0 Reply
Avatar
Garri man October 9, 2024 at 10:25 PM
long story short 8300 ultra is better and it depends on how manufacturers utelize it for their phones like regarding software and like themal coolong with ram and all of that........
+11 Reply
Avatar
Bork September 10, 2024 at 01:30 AM
The Nord 3 is far better when it comes to system fluency....Poco X6 pro is a hit and miss - I am struggling with gestures, swipes and it makes the expierence with HyperOS really bad.....
+22 Reply
Avatar
Noah June 30, 2025 at 06:35 AM
Really you have also bad experience with Miui(Although Hyper Os is newer).I face ghost touch,lags and network issue in my Redmi 10(Snapdragon 680).So I thought budget phones are bad,but here you have problems even in a mid range device.
0 Reply
Avatar
Buyer June 1, 2024 at 02:49 PM
I bought Nord 3 at 21k INR with 9000. Obviously, it's better than Poco X6 Pro, which was at 24k INR with 8300. Though Poco has 256GB UFS 4.0 vs. 128GB UFS 3.1 in Nord.
+59 Reply
Avatar
Divergent June 7, 2024 at 12:04 AM
The camera and ISP on Dimensity 9000 is miles better than on X6 Pro.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Rafael June 19, 2024 at 09:17 AM
I don't want to be that guy, But isn't the SOC performance in GPU way bigger than 9000? I am trying to understand why Nord 3 is better than X6 Pro. Because of the price maybe?
+23 Reply
Avatar
Amro July 6, 2024 at 09:30 PM
Rafael, Probably because the processor itself (D9000) was made to be a high end processor. On the other hand the D8300 wasn't made to be high end
+12 Reply
Avatar
Hiro July 8, 2024 at 08:19 PM
"Obviously" Bruh the 9000 is getting absolutely demolished by the 8300 when it comes to anything regarding performance except for single core cpu test. How is the 9000 then better? πŸ’€πŸ’€
+29 Reply
Avatar
Me-she July 14, 2024 at 09:29 PM
Amro, Flagship CPU in 2021 vs. mid-range CPU in 2023. It's called newer and better technology, regardless of whether it was made to be high-end or not.
+33 Reply
Avatar
LAPOPA April 21, 2025 at 02:13 PM
Hiro, old flagships Are Already optimized while Newer ones taking 4-5 months to optimized due Developers hard time
+1 Reply