Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Dimensity 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus (with Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 graphics) and Dimensity 9000 (Mali-G710 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
  • Performs 3x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~36%)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1822K vs 1504K
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 3050 MHz)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1822096
1504467
CPU 598537 546692
GPU 477311 290175
Memory 326868 237462
UX 419380 430138
Total score 1822096 1504467
Samples [25 tests] [14 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 213.1 MB/sec 170.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 161.1 pages/sec 120.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 177.1 Mpixels/sec 138.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 126.3 images/sec 115.4 images/sec
HDR 169.3 Mpixels/sec 140.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 17 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
Photo processing 50.5 images/sec 38.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.68 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 16 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 14.3 images/sec 8.55 images/sec
Face detection 7.68 images/sec 4.42 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.54 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.67 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 22.3 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2119.5 FPS 1296 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 13 tests 10 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1411 775
Stability - 63%
Graphics test 10 FPS 6 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5769 -
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 19 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3675 2332
Stability 68% 71%
Graphics test 22 FPS 13 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ShΕ«)AnTuTu 121921973
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Hann)AnTuTu 121903771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Swex)AnTuTu 121756995
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Leo)AnTuTu 111784409
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (Hridoy)AnTuTu 111840815
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu 111584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu 111542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu 111561642

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9200 Plus and Dimensity 9000

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3350 MHz 3050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 17 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 Mali-G710 MP10
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1150 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 11 10
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 1408 640
FLOPS 3238.4 Gigaflops 1085.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 MediaTek APU 590

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2023 November 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6985 MT6983
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus official site -
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
28 (84.8%)
5 (15.2%)
Total votes: 33

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9000 and Dimensity 9200 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Lorvie September 25, 2026 at 09:58 AM
choose d9200+ for better performance and graphics rendering.
+23 Reply