Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Dimensity 9200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus (with Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 graphics) and Dimensity 9200 (Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • Performs 17% better in floating-point computations
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 3050 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1822K vs 1755K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1822096
1755232
CPU 598537 549345
GPU 477311 500902
Memory 326868 271291
UX 419380 433694
Total score 1822096 1755232
Samples [25 tests] [4 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 213.1 MB/sec 204.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 161.1 pages/sec 147 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 177.1 Mpixels/sec 170.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 126.3 images/sec 127.6 images/sec
HDR 169.3 Mpixels/sec 153.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 17 images/sec 16.9 images/sec
Photo processing 50.5 images/sec 44.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.68 Mpixels/sec 5.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 16 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 14.3 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Face detection 7.68 images/sec 7.83 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.54 Gpixels/sec 0.47 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.57 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.67 Gpixels/sec 0.58 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 22.3 Gpixels/sec 20.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2119.5 FPS 2042.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 13 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1411 1351
Graphics test 10 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5769 5571
Graphics test 22 FPS 21 FPS
Section 1 25 FPS 23 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 22 FPS
Section 3 19 FPS 19 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3675 3565
Stability 68% 80%
Graphics test 22 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 15272
Video editing score - 5353
Data manipulation score - 13696
Photo editing score - 15932
Writing score - 18803
Phones tested - Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (SwexxπŸ‡ΉπŸ‡·)CPU Throttle91%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (EltaiToktosunov)AnTuTu 122058021
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ShΕ«)AnTuTu 121921973
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Hann)AnTuTu 121903771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Swex)AnTuTu 121756995
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-12 (Shigetora)AnTuTu 111811839
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-06 (Geoff Jan)AnTuTu 111405303
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-06 (TuαΊ₯n Nguyα»…n)AnTuTu 111755232
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 GPU9624
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 CPU1732 / 4274

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9200 Plus and Dimensity 9200

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3350 MHz 3050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 17 billion 17 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1150 MHz 981 MHz
Pipelines 11 11
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1408 1408
FLOPS 3238.4 Gigaflops 2762.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 MediaTek APU 690

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2023 November 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6985 MT6985
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus official site MediaTek Dimensity 9200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
565 (83.8%)
109 (16.2%)
Total votes: 674

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9200 and Dimensity 9200 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Lmao January 8, 2025 at 04:29 PM
Maybe nanoreview is too lazy to update news πŸ˜‚
+6 Reply
Avatar
Stefan September 23, 2024 at 07:14 PM
How is gpu and gaming better on 9200 when clocks are higher on the plus version,like same architecture just higher clocks but still performs worse
+30 Reply