Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 9400 vs A18 Pro – what's better?

Dimensity 9400 vs A18 Pro

Dimensity 9400
VS
A18 Pro
Dimensity 9400
A18 Pro

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12) with the older 6-core Apple A18 Pro (Apple A18 Pro GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (60)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 59%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 1782K
  • Supports 42% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 60 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)
Pros of Apple A18 Pro
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3620 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 9400
vs
A18 Pro

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 9400 +59%
2825187
A18 Pro
1782199
CPU 900074 521852
GPU 972096 562674
Memory 345330 187942
UX 607687 509731
Total score 2825187 1782199
Samples [72 tests] [15 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Dimensity 9400
2797
A18 Pro +28%
3570
Multi-Core Score
Dimensity 9400
8767
A18 Pro +2%
8923
Asset compression 344.4 MB/sec 299.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 251 pages/sec 191.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 258.4 Mpixels/sec 196.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 209.7 images/sec 319.6 images/sec
HDR 267.4 Mpixels/sec 289.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 30.9 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Photo processing 84.4 images/sec 91 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.3 Mpixels/sec 9.03 Mpixels/sec
Samples 22 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Dimensity 9400
21574
A18 Pro +54%
33278
Background blur 43 images/sec 62.5 images/sec
Face detection 19.8 images/sec 78.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.98 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 1.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.71 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.49 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 73.3 Gpixels/sec 100 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3456.3 FPS 3659.7 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 17 tests 7 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Dimensity 9400 +37%
2371
A18 Pro
1732
Score 2371 1732
Stability 61% 71%
Graphics test 18 FPS 13 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Dimensity 9400 +42%
10747
A18 Pro
7585
Score 10747 7585
Graphics test 41 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 46 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 42 FPS 30 FPS
Section 3 36 FPS 21 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 6272 -
Graphics test 37 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14420 -
Video editing score 6211 -
Data manipulation score 16192 -
Photo editing score 30985 -
Writing score 19569 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> BronelliantAnTuTu 122833803
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN)AnTuTu 112765026
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
Add View all (94)
Apple A18 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (FontFrontPromptORG)Geekbench 7 CPU3087 / 8369
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> RappzzzzAnTuTu 112043169
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (thuanday)AnTuTu 112043169
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Jonibek)AnTuTu 111692383
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Neuron)AnTuTu 111500141
Add View all (34)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 and A18 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720		 2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3620 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 12 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 10 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Apple A18 Pro GPU
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines 12 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 768
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 2289 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3		 - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA APL1V07
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4453 (87.4%)
644 (12.6%)
Total votes: 5097

Related Comparisons

1. Apple A18 Pro vs Apple A17 Pro (19)
2. Apple A18 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) (146)
3. Apple A18 Pro vs Apple A18 (33)
4. Apple A18 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (46)
5. Apple A18 Pro vs Apple A16 Bionic (1)
6. Apple A18 Pro vs Apple M4 (iPad) (14)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) (217)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (1)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (20)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (5)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A18 Pro and Dimensity 9400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Sechear January 17, 2025 at 02:32 AM
Btw, 9400 only reaches its highest gb6 scores at 18watts compared to the a18 pros 12 watts
+11 Reply
Avatar
Nice one February 8, 2025 at 07:03 AM
Where did you get that info from?
+32 Reply
Avatar
LGs but evil March 18, 2025 at 05:33 PM
Nice one, Geekerwan on YouTube
+4 Reply
Avatar
Another guy January 3, 2025 at 09:58 AM
1. Snapdragon 8 Elite 2. Mediatek Dimensity 9400 3. Apple A18 pro GG's this year Qualcomm Mediatek is catching up crazy fast Apple can be the stepping stones I guess
+36 Reply
Avatar
Aliyu Ndagi June 14, 2025 at 02:21 PM
You forget Xiaomi Kirin 01.
+1 Reply
Avatar
person June 28, 2025 at 05:45 PM
Aliyu Ndagi, *XRING O1, not Kirin and not 01 (zero-one) O1. (o-one)
+1 Reply
Avatar
0_0 December 27, 2024 at 10:43 PM
I can't watch this..too painfull for 🍎 fanboys...But they still gonna buy newest shiny apple? πŸ«΅πŸ˜­πŸ˜‚
+43 Reply
Avatar
yes December 29, 2024 at 11:15 AM
yes.
+6 Reply
Avatar
dear son January 17, 2025 at 11:46 AM
if apple started taking it seriously then apple can provide their m4 chip in phone also
+10 Reply
Avatar
apple do something good you have the tech June 28, 2025 at 05:47 PM
dear son , yes. or even a possible "M4 Lite" version that has better thermals or smth just atleast do something for the pro models that isnt just adding a camera
0 Reply
Avatar
ItzAhh December 25, 2024 at 10:24 PM
Mediatek win ahh momentπŸ₯±....Cant wait a18's fps leaks in 3D Mark!! So we can see how much better mediatek is...30% or more? πŸ€”πŸ«΅πŸŽπŸ˜‚
+18 Reply
Avatar
LGs February 4, 2025 at 06:40 PM
Benchmarks are one thing, real world performance and optimization is another. realistically the Dimensity 9400 cant beat the A18 pro because of optimization and I think that's always more important than raw performance.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Hmmm February 8, 2025 at 07:05 AM
LGs, Dimensity's raw performance surely crashes a18 pro before they even get next go each other. Cant wait to see vivo X200 beating iphone 16 pro max in real-life speed and camera tests πŸ₯±πŸ‘‹
+18 Reply
Avatar
Steve November 5, 2024 at 06:43 PM
you should change the CPU performance on the A18 pro to 99 or 100 (most likely 99) because it beats the Dimensity 9400 in multicore by a little bit and the dimensity 9400 in single core by a lot yet its still at 98? I don't think that's fair
+10 Reply
Avatar
Phenro November 9, 2024 at 06:00 AM
That's because the the performance per watt is better than A18 and it also runs more efficiently than it... Single core is higher not by raw power but by implementation of SME which only has application in AI, a domain where the 9300 itself scores better than A18 Pro...
+46 Reply
Avatar
somone#47 December 2, 2024 at 09:04 PM
Phenro, But don't they use almost the same amount of wattage? If they don't please tell me how different it is or how much watts they use
0 Reply
Avatar
SoC fan December 10, 2024 at 04:32 AM
somone#47, That's almost amount combined throughout the whole sessions makes a lot of difference in efficiency and keeps it cool And well as we all know Iphones compared to Androids don't have that many functions and sensors So keeping the all in check and everything it's scored (I might be wrong but that's my Thesis)
0 Reply
Avatar
LGs January 11, 2025 at 06:09 AM
Phenro, But Isn’t the a18 pro more efficient? In gb6 scores the a18 pro has better performance per watt and is only behind the 8 elite
0 Reply
Avatar
Jatin October 19, 2024 at 11:13 AM
Multi core scores are lower on A18 Pro Single core scores are lower on 9400 because it runs on 3.6 ghz rather than 4 ghz on A18 Pro If both cores runs on same frequency than its over for apple Also the apple gpu is too weak as compared to 8 gen 4 or 9400
+67 Reply
Avatar
Yeah November 1, 2024 at 04:51 AM
But M4 beats them but it's only available in tablets and pc where u can actually utilise such performance
+7 Reply
Avatar
Dandee October 12, 2024 at 09:29 AM
Many people don’t realize that while the MediaTek chip can theoretically reach 7 TFLOPS at full power, it only hits this peak under maximum power usage and throttles quickly due to power constraints. In contrast, the A18 Pro delivers a consistent 2.3 TFLOPS without significant power consumption. As a result, the MediaTek chip likely operates far below its potentialβ€”around 1-2 TFLOPS at best. Additionally, Android games and apps aren't typically optimized for a single chip, making the comparison even more skewed. The Apple chip, with its ability to run at full power consistently, will always perform better in real-world scenarios.
+37 Reply
Avatar
akp831 October 14, 2024 at 12:48 PM
Dimensity 9400 archives 134 fps in geekbench
+67 Reply
Avatar
Tiglath__ October 14, 2024 at 09:59 PM
This amount of cope is so pathetic tbh. I can't believe you as a consumer is protecting a company because it has been outperformed by its competition instead of taking it as winning for having better, cheaper and more powerful options. Sometimes Apple behaves in its way due to consumers like you.
+58 Reply
Avatar
Anurag October 15, 2024 at 06:11 AM
What real world scenarios? App launch, gaming, or what. Dimesnity beats apple in those 2. Have you not seen geekrwan videos?
+77 Reply
Avatar
Nazaaki October 18, 2024 at 11:52 PM
Do you realize what you say even if the chip will really give 7 terraflop it is no longer powerful on the gpu part which has been demonstrated several times even by this predecessor the mediatek chip literally has double the power of Apple graphics processor and bury does the right thing
+13 Reply
Avatar
Someone out there January 18, 2025 at 04:28 PM
Tiglath__, Finally!! Someone with active brain cells
+1 Reply
Avatar
Boris October 9, 2024 at 02:08 PM
A18 Pro averages 8900-9300 for MC and 3300-3500 for SC with iOS 18.0.1 Update your scores. They are quite outdated.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Mohammad October 9, 2024 at 01:03 PM
Just look at GPU test is double a18 Pro GPU
+22 Reply
Avatar
Dandee October 12, 2024 at 09:32 AM
It doesn't matter because the MediaTek chip will never use that kind of power due to power consumption. To reach that level of performance, it would need 20 watts or more, which is unthinkable for a phoneβ€”it would last only minutes, not even a full hour. Meanwhile, the A18 Pro consistently delivers full power with minimal power consumption.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Zeeshan October 14, 2024 at 06:35 PM
Dandee, Stop being apple fan boy. go to geekerwan. d9400 has destroyed a18 pro in gaming. I dont know why you have to just be a fan boy. Just accept the truth and support your favorite to do better next time.
+43 Reply
Avatar
Gusta October 15, 2024 at 06:45 AM
Dandee, Almost all new Android flagship use Silica battery. Just look at Vivo X200 series batteries. It's so much bigger.
+19 Reply
Avatar
ThunderPanda October 16, 2024 at 11:55 AM
Gusta, the comparisons are made by power consumption not by battery size πŸ˜“
0 Reply
Avatar
Jaja October 17, 2024 at 12:40 PM
Dandee, FYI Apple meat-rider, the GPU of D9400 can match the peak performance of the GPU of A18 Pro at half the power consumption. Plus, even with the higher clock speed, the GPU of D9400 still consumes slightly less power than the GPU of A18 Pro. A18 Pro only beats D9400 in CPU.
+16 Reply
Avatar
MrLeaf October 18, 2024 at 02:30 AM
Jaja, with root and undervolting you will get even more performance because they tend to overvolt the gpu .so it will use less power,and with less power comes less heat.
+7 Reply
Avatar
someone October 24, 2024 at 05:06 AM
Zeeshan, buddy you cannot find anything now so your blaming him get 4 ghz first
+1 Reply
Avatar
Steve November 5, 2024 at 06:45 PM
Jaja, FYI AnTuTu also depends on the phones OS not just the 🀯
0 Reply
Avatar
SHASHANK October 8, 2024 at 05:01 PM
After latest iOS 18.0.1 update the scores are much higher of A18 Pro because there is a performance bump.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Daeho September 5, 2024 at 02:22 PM
I can't wait to see the chipset for laptops/desktops that Mediatek and Nvidia will collaborate on πŸ”₯
+45 Reply
Avatar
Hariom August 19, 2024 at 11:49 AM
Congratulations dimensity lovers we rule again .....
+47 Reply
Avatar
Akib Khan August 11, 2024 at 06:34 AM
I promise This Dimensity 9400 will destroy Apple A18 Pro 🍎 And Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 4.
+67 Reply
Avatar
Daeho September 5, 2024 at 02:21 PM
Don't compare the Apple A18 Pro with the 9400 or 8 Gen 4 because the A18 Pro competes with the previous chipsets of both (9300 and 8 Gen 3) which were launched at the end of last year☠️
+31 Reply
Avatar
Muz_2173 September 27, 2024 at 03:07 AM
Daeho, It's fair to do so as these are every companies newer chips.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Boris October 9, 2024 at 02:10 PM
A18 Pro is 9000+ for MC in iOS 18.0.1 and around 3400-3600 for SC. It destroys the MediaTek.
+5 Reply
Avatar
... October 11, 2024 at 08:27 AM
Boris, Lol. See the AnTuTu CPU score πŸ’€
+9 Reply
Avatar
no October 14, 2024 at 05:38 AM
Daeho, No they don't lol 😭
+5 Reply
Avatar
YouDummyBeach October 17, 2024 at 12:43 PM
Daeho, A18/A18 Pro - 9400 - 8 Gen 4 A17 Pro - 9300 - 8 Gen 3 A16 - 9200 - 8 Gen 2 A15 - 9000 - 8+ Gen 1/8 Gen 1
+2 Reply
Avatar
AJMM October 21, 2024 at 10:32 AM
Muz_2173, Both soc were launched this year and we compare the best from the company at the moment.
0 Reply
Avatar
Sudhurcules August 8, 2024 at 01:56 PM
I will say what I saw in the comments, yeah it is good to see other companies are gaining to have a fair competition with Apple's bionic chip, but seriously those chipset makers should think about making the chips very efficient
+6 Reply
Avatar
Rud September 22, 2024 at 04:40 AM
Go see the battery test my Mr whosetheboss on yt (16 pro max, 16 plus vs s24 ultra)
+7 Reply
Avatar
Steve November 5, 2024 at 10:57 PM
Rud, This is incorrect because you only used one source which is unreliable, many other people shows that the 16pm beats s24U.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity July 25, 2024 at 08:38 PM
We promise all of our fans. We will destroy apple 🍎 and Qualcomm πŸ‘Œ
+58 Reply
Avatar
Chidera Micheal July 3, 2024 at 09:40 PM
Whoa what a close match πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…
0 Reply
Avatar
Dis nats June 27, 2024 at 04:01 AM
I'd choose dimensity over apple because apple is so expensive and its good but not too great
+37 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee June 2, 2024 at 07:56 PM
I don't think the gap between the single core scores of Apple A18 Pro and Dimensity 9400 would be that significant, i.e., around 3600+ for A18 Pro and around 2800 for Dimensity 9400. I believe Dimensity 9400 would have a single core score of around 2800-2900 and a multi-core score of around 11,000 something. And Apple A18 Pro will have a single core score of around 3400 - 3550 and a multi-core score of around 9500 something. Android is almost catching up with iOS in terms of single core score of CPU and has already outperformed Apple in multi-core score. And in GPU too, I think Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 and Dimensity 9400 would have a little more powerful GPUs than their Apple counterpart, i.e., Apple GPU. I'm glad that happens because I'm tired of people obsessing with iPhones and though I think iPhones are great, they are too expensive, especially in countries like India where I live. For example, in the USA, a 256 GB iPhone 15 Pro Max costs around $1,100 while the same phone costs around β‚Ή1,50,000 in India. If you convert dollars to rupees, $1,100 is around β‚Ή91,000 something, so, a 256 GB iPhone 15 Pro Max is more expensive in India by around β‚Ή60,000, which, when converted to dollar is around $720+. So, we in India pay an extra $720+ to get the same phone than what the buyers in USA pay, which is insane, to say the least. If the difference in price were around $100 - $150, then I'd be alright but $720+ is too much, you know. You could get a good Android phone with $720+ (β‚Ή60,000) in India like the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered phones like OnePlus 12, IQoo 12 (16GB +512GB) and so on. This is why I don't want to buy iPhones in India and I haven't, it's because I not only have no money to buy the iPhones but I think it's daylight robbery, too, considering the difference in price in India and other countries like America.
+32 Reply
Avatar
Stacy Freshener October 16, 2024 at 09:56 AM
Yes this is the price difference and because I live in Asia but not from India or China , it's even worse for us because it will be imported from there . So for example , phones that are good midrange in India or China can be Flagship price. 300$ phones in there can be 400$-500$ dependingly and from ship to other parts can be more or so. This is however still less than that Humoungous 720 $ ! I paid 800$ for a 500$ laptop because it has to ship from outside but iphone price there is crazy.. What's worse is if that same Indian Iphone comes to our place it can reach ,2300$ ! It's even worse for countries from other continent when there is heavy tax :0
+12 Reply
Avatar
Randy chan April 23, 2024 at 02:53 AM
Comparing the Media Tek dimensity 9400 chip which runs on android to Apple A18 pro chip which runs on iOS is kinda like comparing oranges to apples since some people prefer android while others prefer iOS. That said, you can't compare those 2 chips against each other.
+30 Reply
Avatar
Phenro April 25, 2024 at 07:06 AM
Actually no, that's not at all true... while yes the A18 is a system on chip, compared to the D9400 and SD8G4, the performance is what matters... the geekbench score and 3d mark wildlife scores.... especially these two.... So yes the comparison does make sense, even if they are not fundamentally the same.... Needless to say, for the current smartphones, 2500+ single core is more than enough and 7000+ multicore is more than enough... We have finally reached a stage where chipsets are actually overperforming, more than necessary.... Like 3500 single core of A18 is not going to be drastically faster than 2900 single core of A17... Similarly, 10000 multicore of D9400 is not going to be drastically faster than 7500 multicore of D9300 Even though the difference is huge, 99% of time in real life we won't notice the difference.
+66 Reply
Avatar
PeeCee July 10, 2024 at 04:14 AM
Phenro, Very True, I think the chip makers should focus more on efficiency rather than power. A single core score of 2500 and a multi core score of 7000/8000 is more than enough to handle everything with ease
+8 Reply
Avatar
Lolimerlin July 19, 2024 at 10:14 AM
PeeCee, Actually no new games are now getting heavier and heavier, take wuthering waves as an example.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 21, 2025 at 03:35 PM
PeeCee, That's not true because applications and games are getting heavier and heavier so the chipsets need to keep up with that much power.
0 Reply
EnglishРусский