Dimensity 9400 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8400
  • Shows significantly better (up to 45%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 2825K vs 1948K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 3250 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2825187
1948428
CPU 900074 623766
GPU 972096 596540
Memory 345330 331200
UX 607687 396922
Total score 2825187 1948428
Samples [72 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 344.4 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 251 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 258.4 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 209.7 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 267.4 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 30.9 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 84.4 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.3 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 22 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21574
Background blur 43 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 19.8 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.71 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 73.3 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3456.3 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 17 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2371 1346
Stability 61% 86%
Graphics test 18 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
10747
Score 10747 5948
Graphics test 41 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 46 FPS 25 FPS
Section 2 42 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 36 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 6272 -
Graphics test 37 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
15020
Web score 14420 14034
Video editing score 6211 6661
Data manipulation score 16192 13175
Photo editing score 30985 23584
Writing score 19569 17637
Phones tested 6 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> BronelliantAnTuTu 122833803
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN)AnTuTu 112765026
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Gelo)AnTuTu 122223623
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Abdul)AnTuTu 122149140
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Kkk)AnTuTu 122149090
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-25 (ะ”ะธะผั‡ะธะบัƒั)AnTuTu 122071934

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.62 GHz โ€“ Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A720
1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3620 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 12 MB 6 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture Valhall 5th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 12 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 896
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 880
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 December 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
218 (72.9%)
81 (27.1%)
Total votes: 299

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 9400, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mahmoud June 2, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Dimencity, best CpU!
+11 Reply