Dimensity 9400 vs Dimensity 9300 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and 9300 Plus (Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 9300 Plus
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Performs 24% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 20%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 2348K
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 3400 MHz)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2825187
CPU 900074 703826
GPU 972096 790915
Memory 345330 326393
UX 607687 527114
Total score 2825187 2348248
Samples [72 tests] [94 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 344.4 MB/sec 300.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 251 pages/sec 204.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 258.4 Mpixels/sec 254.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 209.7 images/sec 161.7 images/sec
HDR 267.4 Mpixels/sec 239.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 30.9 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Photo processing 84.4 images/sec 69 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.3 Mpixels/sec 7.77 Mpixels/sec
Samples 22 tests 38 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 43 images/sec 26.8 images/sec
Face detection 19.8 images/sec 12 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.69 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.81 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.71 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 73.3 Gpixels/sec 30.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3456.3 FPS 3146.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 17 tests 26 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2371 1831
Stability 61% 91%
Graphics test 18 FPS 14 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 10747 7559
Graphics test 41 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 46 FPS 32 FPS
Section 2 42 FPS 29 FPS
Section 3 36 FPS 24 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 6272 5071
Graphics test 37 FPS 30 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14420 12141
Video editing score 6211 5576
Data manipulation score 16192 12937
Photo editing score 30985 29738
Writing score 19569 22352
Phones tested 6 models 11 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat)AnTuTu 122403705
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410AnTuTu 122626976
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ThΓ nh)AnTuTu 122400294
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (NK808)AnTuTu 122667628
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (TuαΊ₯n Nguyα»…πŸ‡»πŸ‡³)AnTuTu 122637244

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 and Dimensity 9300 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3620 MHz 3400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 22.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7.3 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
Architecture Valhall 5th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 12 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 3993.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 790
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5T
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T830
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 May 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA MT6989, MT6989W/TCZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
555 (76.8%)
168 (23.2%)
Total votes: 723

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9300 Plus and Dimensity 9400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Yuzaki September 27, 2025 at 07:35 AM
Why Dimensity 9300 Plus better than Dimensity 9400 at gaming!!
+13 Reply
Serhii September 28, 2025 at 08:34 AM
Thank you for your comment.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Someone out there February 18, 2025 at 02:10 PM
What the hell happened to MTK 9400?! Why the GPU Score at 92% and the MTK 9300+ at 93%?!!
0 Reply
Avatar
sasha889 December 8, 2024 at 02:53 PM
Great work Mtk! Still is better than snap
+10 Reply
Avatar
Nafis December 26, 2024 at 02:15 AM
Nope. It's far behind 8 gen 3. Only gpu is a little bit good but the stability is wor
+1 Reply
Avatar
Timmy? A turtle. January 31, 2025 at 06:37 PM
Nafis, Hey, just accept that MediaTek actually makes good processors that are now on par with the newest and latest Qualcomm processors
+20 Reply
Avatar
Mohammad April 11, 2025 at 08:20 PM
Do you know snapdragon 8 elite ? :)
0 Reply
Avatar
Sawon November 5, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Nafis, No. 9300 plus is better than 8g3, 9400 is slightly below 8 elite, but it has better efficiency. 9400+ is better than 8 elite in both
+1 Reply
Avatar
Sawon November 5, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Mohammad, Yes. But I prefer 9400 plus
0 Reply
Avatar
Spencer Frazier October 14, 2024 at 11:50 PM
I feel sorry for the people who JUST bought the Tab s10 knowing now a better 3nm is behind the next door.
+26 Reply
Avatar
tyler January 16, 2025 at 06:10 PM
Samsung's last tab lineup had last gen's soc as well, it's really odd as to why Samsung uses old tech in their new tabs. Though I guess I can't complain, they are still very capable.
0 Reply
Avatar
Randy chan June 28, 2024 at 09:36 PM
Media Tek's 3nm node process in their upcoming dimensity 9400 offers a significant performance boost over the 4nm node process in the dimensity 9300 and even the dimensity 9300+. The smaller node process is very important for enhanced performance as you can see in the comparison chart. By contrast having the same size node process will only produce miniscule gain since the 9300+ is hardly any higher than 9300 since they're on the same 4nm node process.
+46 Reply