Dimensity 9400e vs Dimensity 9400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400e (with Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and Dimensity 9400 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 9400e
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Performs 24% better in floating-point computations
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 3400 MHz)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 2518K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2518801
2825187
CPU 750689 900074
GPU 837912 972096
Memory 344946 345330
UX 585254 607687
Total score 2518801 2825187
Samples [46 tests] [72 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 305.9 MB/sec 344.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 220.6 pages/sec 251 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 282.3 Mpixels/sec 258.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 163.9 images/sec 209.7 images/sec
HDR 222.6 Mpixels/sec 267.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 26.8 images/sec 30.9 images/sec
Photo processing 55.3 images/sec 84.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.83 Mpixels/sec 9.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples 4 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21574
Background blur 28.2 images/sec 43 images/sec
Face detection 14.6 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.68 Gpixels/sec 0.78 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.07 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 1.71 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.2 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.1 Gpixels/sec 73.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3105.4 FPS 3456.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1916 2371
Stability 59% 61%
Graphics test 14 FPS 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 8016 10747
Graphics test 30 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 33 FPS 46 FPS
Section 2 31 FPS 42 FPS
Section 3 27 FPS 36 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 6272
Graphics test - 37 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16664
Web score 17404 14420
Video editing score 6537 6211
Data manipulation score 16007 16192
Photo editing score 26787 30985
Writing score 23124 19569
Phones tested 3 models 6 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Aziz)AnTuTu 122571021
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Iles)AnTuTu 122596082
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> Regenis0AnTuTu 122579291
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Iles)AnTuTu 112563619
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (montyy)AnTuTu 112483073
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> BronelliantAnTuTu 122833803
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN)AnTuTu 112765026
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400e and Dimensity 9400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3400 MHz 3620 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 22.7 billion -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture 5th gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 12 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 3993.6 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 MediaTek NPU 890
NPU theoretical performance - 50 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 October 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400e official site MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
78 (28.4%)
197 (71.6%)
Total votes: 275

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9400 and Dimensity 9400e, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Yuzaki July 7, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Why Dimensity 9400e better than Dimensity 9400?
+39 Reply
Avatar
Hifihh April 20, 2026 at 06:59 AM
In efficiency and sustained performance it's better in dm 9400e
+1 Reply
Avatar
Hani May 30, 2025 at 11:33 PM
How 9400e comes before 9400 ????????
+6 Reply
Avatar
H4x June 3, 2025 at 07:29 AM
Are you mad?? it's clearly mentioned that 9400e came later
+10 Reply
a7med May 17, 2025 at 12:47 PM
so 9400e is just 9300+ its equal to 8 gen 3 and 8s gen 4
+23 Reply
Avatar
Nano_user June 6, 2025 at 06:10 AM
It is slightly better than sgen3 and 8s gen4
+14 Reply