Dimensity 9500 vs Dimensity 1200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (with Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 graphics) and Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Performs 10.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.9x) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 960K
  • Supports 150% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 1200
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~94%)
  • 40% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3000 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3760662
CPU 1048345 384772
GPU 1432351 144433
Memory 476680 177452
UX 803286 254067
Total score 3760662 960724
Samples [119 tests] [12 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3352
Multi-Core Score
10402
Asset compression 397.3 MB/sec 168.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 292.7 pages/sec 95.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 328.1 Mpixels/sec 131.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 234.3 images/sec 71.4 images/sec
HDR 328.1 Mpixels/sec 117.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 40.9 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 109.9 images/sec 32.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 10.3 Mpixels/sec 4.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
25501
Background blur 47.2 images/sec 6.87 images/sec
Face detection 26.1 images/sec 3.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.31 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.68 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 91.9 Gpixels/sec 14.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3324.6 FPS 838.9 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 14 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3119 442
Stability 57% 96%
Graphics test 23 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 13319 -
Graphics test 51 FPS -
Section 1 55 FPS -
Section 2 52 FPS -
Section 3 43 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1311
Stability - 79%
Graphics test - 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
15165
Web score 14375 9284
Video editing score 5995 6385
Data manipulation score 12159 10275
Photo editing score 34571 25491
Writing score 22695 14338
Phones tested 4 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 68 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 71 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (hi)AnTuTu 123485917
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (weipoh09)AnTuTu 123319530
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu 11960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu 11773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu 11961761

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9500 and Dimensity 1200

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 4210 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 32 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 320 KB
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 4.3 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1716 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 12 9
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 1536 288
FLOPS 5271.5 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance 100 TOPS 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution - 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 19
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2025 January 2021
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6993 MT6893
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
7 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 7

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1200 and Dimensity 9500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!