Dimensity 7200 vs Dimensity 1200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (with Mali-G610 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 7200
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2800 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
971424
CPU 362430 384772
GPU 148984 144433
Memory 169068 177452
UX 290942 254067
Total score 971424 960724
Samples [37 tests] [12 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 127.3 MB/sec 168.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.9 pages/sec 95.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 86.6 Mpixels/sec 131.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 42.2 images/sec 71.4 images/sec
HDR 76.7 Mpixels/sec 117.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.69 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 21.9 images/sec 32.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.36 Mpixels/sec 4.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.06 images/sec 6.87 images/sec
Face detection 2.89 images/sec 3.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.3 Gpixels/sec 14.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 909.5 FPS 838.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 447 442
Stability - 96%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1158 1311
Stability 99% 79%
Graphics test 6 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 9284
Video editing score - 6385
Data manipulation score - 10275
Photo editing score - 25491
Writing score - 14338
Phones tested - 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 68 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 71 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu1003769
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (note8techh)AnTuTu984744
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 -> HuuPhatAnTuTu996454
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekBench GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekBench CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu961761

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7200 and Dimensity 1200

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB 32 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 320 KB
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4.3 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP4 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1130 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 4 9
Shading units 64 32
Total shaders 256 288
FLOPS 578.6 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 650 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 19
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 January 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6886 MT6893
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7400 - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
237 (20.4%)
924 (79.6%)
Total votes: 1161

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1200 and Dimensity 7200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jon doe July 11, 2025 at 06:14 AM
D1200 is not very good, 6nm TSCM was not a good node to the point 7nm+ of SD865/870 is better. Definitely go for 7200 ultra if you can, much better for gaming and much more stable thanks to the 4nm TSCM fab which is excellent.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Jony June 9, 2025 at 04:32 AM
Dimensity 1200 is always good, That's why K40 gaming beats CMF phone 1 and other newly released transsion phones, I am currently using a k40 gaming and its unstoppable.
+12 Reply